Quantcast
Channel: Headline Archives - The Armenian Weekly
Viewing all 2285 articles
Browse latest View live

Memorial Forest Planted in Armenia

$
0
0

Renowned 19th-century Armenian writer Raffi (Hagop Melik Hagopian) begins his 1880 classic Khentuh (The Fool)with the following simple, yet significant words: “While the prudent stand and ponder, the fool has already crossed the river.”

The novel, which calls for a national awakening among Armenians, is just as relevant in its message today as it was nearly a century ago when it was written. While Raffi’s fool struggled to escape the shackles of oppression and looked to form a national homeland for the Armenian people, today’s fools try to sustain and develop that very same homeland envisioned in the book.

Sosé Thomassian and Allen Yekikian

Sosé Thomassian and Allen Yekikian

Sosé Thomassian and Allen Yekikian were two such fools.

Born and raised in the United States, where the two were devoted members of the Armenian community, the young couple moved to Armenia in early 2013. While they had set out together to live their dream in the land of their ancestors, their lives were tragically cut short on May 10, 2013, in a fatal car accident on their way to Georgia.

Sosé and Allen’s passing sent shockwaves throughout Armenia and the Armenian Diaspora, prompting many to question how such a tragedy could occur to two such exemplary, loving people. But perhaps more importantly, their story inspired a generation to engage with Armenia, to actively try to be a part of its development and progress. Moreover, it motivated and encouraged a small, yet dedicated group of young men and women to leave their diasporan realities and to make the move to Armenia to realize their dreams.

Sosé and Allen were part of a new generation of fools who chose to cross the river and not to stand prudently idle. And today, that generation keeps Sosé and Allen’s dream alive.

Organized by the Armenia Tree Project in collaboration with Sosé and Allen’s Legacy Foundation, work began on a living, breathing memorial forest that will eventually contain some 50,000 trees.

Organized by the Armenia Tree Project in collaboration with Sosé and Allen’s Legacy Foundation, work began on a living, breathing memorial forest that will eventually contain some 50,000 trees.

On Sat., April 18, 2014, over a hundred volunteers, young and old, came together in the small Armenian village of Stepanavan to help preserve Sosé and Allen’s memory and to continue their dream of a better Armenia. Organized by the Armenia Tree Project in collaboration with Sosé and Allen’s Legacy Foundation, work began on a living, breathing memorial forest that will eventually contain some 50,000 trees.

Over a hundred volunteers, young and old, came together in the small Armenian village of Stepanavan to help preserve Sosé and Allen’s legacy.

Over a hundred volunteers, young and old, came together in the small Armenian village of Stepanavan to help preserve Sosé and Allen’s legacy.

The tree planting proved how much of an impact the couple had on people from all walks of life. From the group of young Birthright Armenia volunteers to locals from Stepanavan, Yerevan, Proshyan, and even as far away as Artsakh, Saturday’s planting of the memorial forest was evidence that Sosé and Allen’s dream is shared among all Armenians.

Sosé and Allen’s roots were deeply entrenched in Armenia, just as the trees planted in their memorial forest will be in the near future. And it is that very same forest that will help preserve their memory and inspire a new generation of fools in the years to come.

The tree planting proved how much of an impact the couple had on people from all walks of life.

The tree planting proved how much of an impact the couple had on people from all walks of life.

The post Memorial Forest Planted in Armenia appeared first on Armenian Weekly.


Congressional Delegation Commemorates Genocide in Yerevan

$
0
0

“It’s much harder to get tomorrow right if we get yesterday wrong.” —Chairman Ed Royce, U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, Speaking at the Armenian Genocide Memorial in Armenia

YEREVAN—In a powerful show of American solidarity with the Armenian people, the Chairman and Ranking Member of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee traveled to Armenia this April 24th to join with government officials and hundreds of thousands of Armenian citizens participating in events marking the 99th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI), Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA), Ranking Democrat Eliot Engel (D-NY), ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian and Rep. Lois Frankel (D-FL) in a moment of silence as they approach the Armenian Genocide Memorial.

Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI), Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA), Ranking Democrat Eliot Engel (D-NY), ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian and Rep. Lois Frankel (D-FL) in a moment of silence as they approach the Armenian Genocide Memorial.

Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) and Ranking Democrat Eliot Engel (D-NY) were joined on this Congressional Delegation by House Foreign Affairs panel members David Cicilline (D-RI) and Lois Frankel (D-FL).  The Congressional delegation held meetings with Armenian President Serge Sarkissian, Garegin II, Catholicos and Supreme Patriarch of All Armenians, and other senior Armenian officials, and paid a solemn April 24th visit to Tsitsernakaberd, the national memorial to the Genocide.  Additional meetings are scheduled for Friday, April 25.

Chairman Ed Royce, after placing a wreath at Tsitsernakaberd, noted that: “I am honored to be here in Armenia to express support and solidarity with the Armenian people on this day of solemn remembrance 99 years after the Armenian Genocide.  History is a continuum.  It’s much harder to get tomorrow right if we get yesterday wrong.  It is vital for the world to accurately acknowledge the wrongs of yesterday, so that atrocities like this genocide of 1.5 million Armenians are never again witnessed.”  The senior California legislator added: “I have long and wholeheartedly agreed with President Ronald Reagan, who called this first genocide of the last century exactly what it was—a genocide.”

Congressman Eliot Engel, the senior Democratic member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, speaking during a press conference today, said: “I stand here in solidarity with our Chairman and other members of the Committee to say that it is very important for the world to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, and we call upon Turkey to immediately recognize and apologize for the Armenian Genocide.”

Congressman Cicilline, in a strongly worded statement at Tsitsernakaberd, noted that he was “honored to be here today to remember the one and a half million martyrs who were killed during the Armenian Genocide,” and then went on to “call on Turkey to recognize this historic fact so that we can begin a real conversation about reparations.”  In her comments, Rep. Frankel underscored how honored she felt, “as a Congresswoman and a mother, to stand in solidarity with the people of Armenia.”

Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) and Congressional colleagues with ANCA leaders at the Armenian Genocide Memorial in Armenia.  From Left to Right: ANCA Legislative Affairs Dir. Raffi Karakashian, ANCA WR Chairwoman Nora Hovsepian, ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian, Rep. Lois Frankel (D-FL), Ranking Democrat Eliot Engel (D-NY), Mrs. Marie Royce, Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA), Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI), ANCA National Board Members Steve Mesrobian and Raffi Hamparian.

Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) and Congressional colleagues with ANCA leaders at the Armenian Genocide Memorial in Armenia. From Left to Right: ANCA Legislative Affairs Dir. Raffi Karakashian, ANCA WR Chairwoman Nora Hovsepian, ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian, Rep. Lois Frankel (D-FL), Ranking Democrat Eliot Engel (D-NY), Mrs. Marie Royce, Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA), Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI), ANCA National Board Members Steve Mesrobian and Raffi Hamparian.

Video of the Congressional Delegation’s press conference is available at:

http://youtu.be/3l1Un5AByKQ

A delegation of ANCA leaders traveled to Yerevan earlier in the week to welcome Chairman Royce and his colleagues to Armenia.  ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian thanked the members of the delegation, giving voice to the profound appreciation of Armenians worldwide for their travels to be in Armenia on April 24th and to take part of the nation’s solemn commemoration of the Armenian Genocide.  “We join with Armenians from around the world in thanking Chairman Royce, Ranking Member Engel, Congressman Cicilline, and Congresswoman Frankel for their strong leadership and sincere devotion to a truthful and just resolution of the Armenian Genocide—a crime against all humanity.”

Hachikian is joined by ANCA National Board members Raffi Hamparian and Steve Mesrobian, ANCA Western Region Chairwoman Nora Hovsepian, longtime Orange County area community leader Sylvie Tertzakian and ANCA Legislative Affairs Director Raffi Karakashian.

Pictures from the Congressional delegation’s visit are posted to the ANCA Facebook page at:

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10152166515631859.1073741870.16968936858&type=3

Complete coverage of the Congressional delegation’s visit to Armenia will be provided in upcoming days.

The post Congressional Delegation Commemorates Genocide in Yerevan appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Hundreds Commemorate Genocide in Diyarbakir

$
0
0

DIYARBAKIR, Turkey (A.W.)—Hundreds attended the commemoration of the Armenian and Assyrian genocides here in Diyarbakir on April 24, including Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality co-mayor Fırat Anlı and former mayor of Sur Municipality Abdullah Demirbaş.

A boy stands near the Monument of Common Conscience during the genocide commemoration in Diyarbakir. (Photo by Scout Tufankjian)

A boy stands near the Monument of Common Conscience during the genocide commemoration in Diyarbakir. (Photo by Scout Tufankjian)

The commemoration was jointly organized by the Diyarbakir Bar Association, the Diyarbakir branch of the Human Rights Association of Turkey (HRA), and the Gomidas Institute (GI).

At noon, attendees gathered at the Monument of Common Conscience (Ortak Vicdan Anıtı), where pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) parliamentarian Altan Tan, GI’s Ara Sarafian, head of the Diyarbakir Bar Association Tahir Elçi, and HRA Diyarbakir member Raci Bilici delivered speeches.

Altan Tan stated that the genocide committed in 1915 against Armenians and Assyrians is a dark blemish on the pages of history. Today, only through understanding one another can we defeat the oppressors, he noted.

The speakers at the commemoration (Photo by Gulisor Akkum)

The speakers at the commemoration (Photo by Gulisor Akkum)

Sarafian said that the genocide of the Armenians and Assyrians in 1915 was one of the darkest pages of the history of these lands, and it was followed by the Turkish Republic’s oppression of Kurds, Alevis, liberal intellectuals and communists.

The monument of common conscience can serve as a means of confronting the past. Armenians, Turks, Kurds, and Assyrians should struggle for a better future, Sarafian added.

Elçi briefly talked about the genocide of the Armenians and Assyrians. Today, we share the pain of the Armenians and the Assyrians, he noted.

Speaking on behalf of IHD’s Diyarbakir chapter, Bilici said that the perpetrators of the genocide against the non-Muslims in 1915 not only destroyed entire communities, but confiscated all their possessions. The genocide continues to be denied because of the fear of reparation for the property that was stolen, he added.

This report was filed by The Armenian Weekly Diyarbakir correspondent Gulisor Akkum.

The post Hundreds Commemorate Genocide in Diyarbakir appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Nazarian: Ninety-Nine Years Ago Today

$
0
0

Impressions from the Armenian Genocide commemoration in Istanbul

Ninety-nine years ago in the wee spring hours, Ottoman-era policemen marched through the streets of old Constantinople. Over the course of that fateful night, and the weeks that followed, they arrested and deported the most prominent Armenian writers, poets, journalists, intellectuals and men who lived by the pen from the Golden age of the Armenian intelligentsia in old Constantinople. These men were taken to the Haydarpasha train station and shipped deep into the interior of Ottoman Turkey where they were jailed and murdered.

A scene from the commemoration in Istanbul (Photo by Eric Nazarian)

A scene from the commemoration in Istanbul (Photo by Eric Nazarian)

Only a few survived, among them the iconic Komitas Vartabed, the priest, composer and musicologist who became mute and descended into madness as a result of the horrors he witnessed during the Armenian Genocide.

Komitas’s ancient musical soul went silent and today, 99 years later, I sat on the wet asphalt in the heart of Istanbul listening to his otherworldly voice recorded once upon a time in the early 20th century. It was crackling and booming on multiple loudspeakers among Armenians, Turks and Kurds gathered and jam-packed like sardines to honor the Armenian martyrs and to call what happened here in this country by its rightful name—Genocide. Young, old, middle-aged, natives and diasporans…we all sat side-by-side humming with Komitas, Dle Yaman and Der Voghormya.

Youth and elders held up laminated color and black-and-white photocopies of Krikor Zohrab, Siamanto, Diran Kelekian, Daniel Varoujan and several Ottoman-era Armenians who lived by the pen and were cut down by the swords. Their eyes gazed out from the photocopies at this new, small and fearless generation of Turks and Armenians committed to keeping the flame and voice of memory alive through the act of solemnity and presence together as a unified voice.

This is a brave and vocal minority that has chosen to not be silent. Middle-aged women wept openly. Members of the New Zartonk stood steadfast with printed banners. All gathered had managed through solidarity and sheer will to silence the filet mignon of Bolis real estate where millions pass through on a daily basis.

The press swarmed all over the street, perched on the roofs of businesses and establishments that demonstrated great respect to the commemorators by allowing the photojournalists to lean out of their windows and second-story patios immortalizing this brief hour on this very busy Spring day where the spirits of our one and a half-million dead were prayed for. Next year, this generation will return again and again and again.

While the speechwriters and politicos continue to conjure new ways to manipulate verbs and adjectives to avoid the truth of the Genocide, this new generation will be burning the midnight oil printing out the laminated images of the martyrs.

This small victory is a symbolic one that would have been unimaginable before. However small, its echoes are being heard now very loud and clearly across the world thanks to the point, shoot, save and upload settings in our garden variety of smart phones. And today’s presence and solidarity, like Komitas’s voice, will not be silenced. Today, I began to grasp the meaning of the word “vicdan” which means “conscience” in Turkish.

These young university students and Istanbul natives were here out of duty and a calling sitting on the damp asphalt holding vigil. They were here because they cared. Who would have thought that in 2014 we would hear the ear-shattering boom of Der Voghormya in the ground-zero of Istanbul? That is not to say things here are where they should be. Far from it but each small symbolic step here is a step forward.

After the end of the commemoration, I was handed a red carnation. With Komitas’s voice lingering in my ears, I felt a certain temporary peace gnawed by the begrudging reminder that we would never be able to grasp the complete magnitude of what happened during the Genocide. Yet, we will continue to hold candles to collective and personal memory and through voice, song, image, solidarity and creative outpouring honor and demand justice for what will continue to dwarf our imaginations for generations to come.

The post Nazarian: Ninety-Nine Years Ago Today appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Collaborative Art Installation Commemorates Rwandan Genocide

$
0
0

Area middle and high school students create life-size human forms in response to the tragedy

LINCROFT, N.J.—A collaborative art installation consisting of more than 160 life-sized human forms will be on display April 6 through July 14 at the Center for Holocaust, Human Rights and Genocide Education at Brookdale Community College (chhange) to commemorate the 20th Anniversary of the Rwanda Genocide.

The forms, made of foam and designed by area middle and high school students, are part of a collaborative effort to learn about and respond creatively to the tragedy.

The forms, made of foam and designed by area middle and high school students, are part of a collaborative effort to learn about and respond creatively to the tragedy.

The exhibit, entitled “100 Days of Silence,” corresponds with the 100 days in 1994 when some 800,000 Rwandan men, women and children were killed by Hutu extremists. The title is a reference to the failure of the global community to intervene.

The forms, made of foam and designed by area middle and high school students, are part of a collaborative effort to learn about and respond creatively to the tragedy.

“The exhibit is a chance for students, educators and community members to reflect upon the human experience of the Rwandan people and the silence of the world,” according to Dale Daniels, executive director of chhange. “It is a powerful statement from our children and our community about genocide and humanity.”

The exhibit is open to individuals from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday through Thursday. Groups, as well as those wishing to view the exhibit at additional times, are asked to call 224-1889 to make arrangements.

“It’s a very powerful statement. The kids really got it.”

“It’s a very powerful statement. The kids really got it.”

Daniels credits retired art educator Arlene Smelson for making it possible to tell the Rwandan story in such a unique way.

Earlier in the year, art educators were invited to a workshop at the college where they received a comprehensive lesson plan on the genocide and the foam forms their classes would use to interpret it. During the workshop, they heard from Rwandan survivor Jacqueline Murekatete, who shared her eyewitness testimony. The students were able to hear her testimony through video that the art educators brought back to the classroom.

“It’s a very powerful statement. The kids really got it,” Daniels said.

The post Collaborative Art Installation Commemorates Rwandan Genocide appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Chairman Royce Discusses Artsakh Peace and Security with NKR President

$
0
0

U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) with Republic of Nagorno Karabakh President Bako Sahakyan.

U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) with Republic of Nagorno Karabakh President Bako Sahakyan.

YEREVAN—House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) explored ways to strengthen ongoing U.S. efforts to facilitate a peaceful resolution to the Karabakh issue during a meeting with Nagorno Karabakh Republic (NKR) President Bako Sahakyan earlier today, reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

“We were pleased that U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce held constructive talks with President Sahakyan of the independent Nagorno Karabakh Republic regarding U.S. leadership, within the OSCE Minsk Group, in helping to facilitate a peaceful resolution of issues related to Artsakh’s international status and long-term security,” said ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian. “It always holds special meaning for Americans of Armenian heritage to reinforce the bonds of friendship between the people of America and Artsakh–based on our commonly-held values, commitment to peace, and shared democratic aspirations.”

Sahakyan was joined by NKR Foreign Minister Karen Mirzoyan and the Permanent Representative of NKR to Armenia in discussing the ongoing peace negotiations mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group and urged the strengthening of the U.S.-Artsakh bond.

A scene from U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce's meeting with Republic of Nagorno Karabakh President Bako Sahakyan.

A scene from U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce’s meeting with Republic of Nagorno Karabakh President Bako Sahakyan.

Participating in the discussion was a delegation of ANCA leaders who had traveled to Yerevan earlier in the week to welcome Chairman Royce and his Congressional colleagues to Armenia. The ANCA delegation included Hachikian, ANCA National Board members Raffi Hamparian and Steve Mesrobian, ANCA Western Region Chairwoman Nora Hovsepian, longtime Orange County area community leader Sylvie Tertzakian and ANCA Legislative Affairs Director Raffi Karakashian. Mesrobian and Karakashian also serve on the ANCA Eastern Region Board, which Mesrobian chairs.

The post Chairman Royce Discusses Artsakh Peace and Security with NKR President appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Armenian Americans Protest Genocide Denial at Turkish Embassy

$
0
0

Turkish Prime Minister’s Condolences Ring Hollow as His Embassy Orchestrates Celebration Mocking Murder of Over 2 Million Armenians, Pontians and Syriacs

WASHINGTON–Hundreds of local families held a silent vigil in front of the Turkish Embassy on April 24th, protesting the Turkish Government’s denial of the Armenian Genocide and calling for justice for this crime. The solemn remembrance was met by several dozen anti-Armenian counter-protesters – who blasted Turkish music in a shameful celebration of the murder of 2 million Armenians, Pontian Greeks and Syriacs at the hands of the Ottoman Turkish Government form 1915 to 1923.

A scene from the protest (Photo by Justin Kaladjian)

A scene from the protest (Photo by Justin Kaladjian)

“We are here to tell Turkey that we stand up for the truth and we will continue to do so every year until justice is served for the Armenian Genocide,” said Hagop Simonian, Chairman of the Armenian Youth Federation Washington Ani Chapter, which organized the annual protest. “With the support of our community, we see a growing number of youth joining us every year – and that speaks volumes as we expand the international battle to defend the rights of the Armenian nation.”

The dances and cheers by Turkish counter-protesters to pop-music pumped out of speakers powered from the Turkish Embassy stood in stark contrast to the PR plans of Prime Minister Recep Tayip Erdogan, who sought, through a statement of “condolence” issued just one day before, to repackage his denials under the banner of “shared pain.” The timing and sentiments expressed in his remarks are widely seen as a disingenuous ploy to undermine efforts to secure international affirmation and reparations for the Armenian Genocide.

“The Turkish Prime Minister on the one hand is trying – in a rather clumsy and transparently cynical manner – to present himself as some sort of peacemaker by repackaging his denials in a more sophisticated way, but at the same time his Embassy in Washington is supporting protests cruelly mocking the victims of the Armenian Genocide,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. “The fact is that Turkey is escalating its denials of this crime.”

A highlight of the 2014 protest was the participation by the Hye Riders Motorcycle Club, over a dozen of whom rode some 3,000 miles from Southern California over a four day period to stand with the Greater Washington DC community against Turkey’s lies. The group rode past Armenian and Turkish protesters along Washington’s historic Massachusetts Avenue with Armenian flags waving.

A scene from the protest (Photo by Justin Kaladjian)

A scene from the protest (Photo by Justin Kaladjian)

“We are here to support the DC Armenian Community and to let them know that we are not backing away in the face of Turkish lies,” said Hye Riders president Berdj Kasbarian. “Whether it’s 99 years, 110 or more – Armenians stand together united and a cause like this will continue until we get justice.” Established in 1999, the organization is known for its annual participation in Southern California Armenian Genocide protests and for their generosity for a broad range of community initiatives. Asked if they will be able relax and tour DC for a few days after their long trip, Kasbarian declined noting that the group will be hurrying back to Los Angeles to support the AYF San Fernando Valley Sardarabad Chapter “Cycle Against Denial” bike-a-thon, taking place Sunday, April 27th.

An important goal of the protest was to spotlight the strength and vitality of the Armenian nation in the face of Turkey’s genocide acts – powerfully relayed through the innovative “#TurkeyFailed” social media campaign, launched by the AYF Eastern Region earlier in the week. “#TurkeyFailed because I am alive today,” read one sign carried by a chapter member; “My Grandma survived the Armenian Genocide – #TurkeyFailed,” read another as protesters stood defiant against the Turkish Government.

A scene from the protest (Photo by Justin Kaladjian)

A scene from the protest (Photo by Justin Kaladjian)

Following the demonstration, Armenian Americans gathered at the Armenian Embassy to hold a Requiem Service in memory of Armenian Genocide victims, presided by Rev. Fr. Sarkis Aktavoukian of Soorp Khatch Armenian Church and Rev. Fr. Hovsep Karapetyan of St. Mary Armenian Church and Archbishop Vicken Aykazian, Legate of the Eastern Diocese. His Excellency Ambassador of the Republic of Armenia Tatoul Markarian offered remarks as Washington DC Homenetmen Scouts stood at attention. Following the service, attendees gathered at Soorp Khatch Armenian Church for an expanded Requiem service and Madagh, prepared by the Soorp Khatch Armenian Church Ladies Guild and the Armenian Relief Society.

 

Photos by Justin Kaladjian

The post Armenian Americans Protest Genocide Denial at Turkish Embassy appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Portrait of Bravery: The Life and Times of Dr. Floyd Smith

$
0
0

The Armenian Weekly April 2014 magazine

Born on Dec. 1, 1885 in the small farming town of Rowley, Iowa, the fascinating life of Dr. Floyd Olin Smith had a most humble beginning. In the twilight of his life, he wrote, “my parents, Arthur and Jane Smith, were of pioneer stock, who had migrated from ‘back East’ New England, New York, and Ohio.” Wishing their son to have an education, Dr. Smith received his M.D. in 1911 from the University of Iowa following his graduation from Lenox College.

Emergency passport picture of the Smiths

Emergency passport picture of the Smiths

Smith married his college sweetheart, Bessie Mae Heath, in 1912 and they immediately set out for Turkey to begin life as missionaries under the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM). The initial passport application indicated they expected to be abroad for eight years. Looking back, Dr. Smith wrote:

If you have a liking for a country of undeveloped resources, something of a wild life at times, where the saddle horse is still the prize means of locomotion, when heterogeneous races are mixed yet separate, where Mohammedan mosques are the dominant architecture, where the entering wedges of Christianity are just finding the grain, a land where patience, wisdom, courage, diplomacy, charm of personality have full play, then apply to the American Board for a post in Eastern Turkey.

What follows is an account of the Smiths’ experience as told through letters, diplomatic correspondence, and personal memoirs.

 

Aintab

Dr. Smith and his wife spent the first six months abroad in Paris learning French and making final preparations for missionary life. After initially stopping at the Bible House in Constantinople, where Dr. Smith passed an exam that allowed him to practice medicine, and attending a missionary conference in Jerusalem, they traveled to Aintab with Dr. Henry Atkinson, who was headed back to Kharpert from the conference.

The first six months in Aintab definitely required an adjustment for the Smiths. In October 1913, their first child, Arthur, was born. The birth was a difficult one for Bessie as she developed several post-partum hemorrhages. In addition, Dr. Smith felt certain that deficiencies existed in his training due to a truncated internship. In Aintab, he was learning from Dr. Fred Shepard, a 30-year veteran missionary. Yet, he felt the large staff already in place in Aintab limited his exposure to work crucial to his development. He offered that it might be beneficial to spend time in Talas while one of the physicians there was on leave to America, a view shared by Dr. Shepard. Dr. Smith had been destined for Diyarbakir from the beginning and, at the very least, felt a nurse would be a necessity there.

In early 1914, Dr. Smith had appendicitis that required emergency surgery. With his illness and Bessie’s long recovery from giving birth, the primary objective of learning Turkish was prolonged. Letters home tell of missionary life at the station and descriptions by proud parents of the growth of their son Arthur. They also warn their parents “not to print anything about the people here which we may send you, for there are Turkish correspondents in America who read the papers and everything about Turkey is sent right back here to the Sultan.”

After about a year in Aintab, the Smiths traveled to Kharpert, passing through Urfa and Diyarbakir where they were able to see their future quarters. They spent the summer of 1914 in Kharpert, where around 50 missionaries and their families attended the annual conference.

In early August, letters home contained the first mention of the anticipated war. Soon, the government began enlisting men between the ages of 20-45. Dr. Smith wrote, “This has caused great anxiety locally, especially among the Armenians. Also the Turks are not at all pleased.” Dr. Smith was able to buy a thoroughbred Arabian horse for 65-75 percent of the true value because the owner feared the horse would be requisitioned by the army.

Interestingly, around this time it seems that many of the Smiths’ letters home never arrived. This caused their families some anxiety and led to inquiries at the State Department.

 

Diyarbakir

They were unable to leave for Diyarbakir until the end of October 1914. Once in Diyarbakir, correspondence could no longer be done in English, as the government required either Turkish or French be used. Regardless, due to the conditions, there was little correspondence from the Smiths during their time in Diyarbakir.

After the official outbreak of the war, the British consul in Diyarbakir left the papers of the consulate with the Smiths. The intention was to transfer the archives to the American consulate in Kharpert when circumstances would allow. However, when nurse Margaret Campbell arrived in April from Kharpert, it was determined that the wisest course of action was to burn the archives, which they did, taking two weeks to do so.

During the winter of 1914-15, Diyarbakir had a typhus outbreak. Dr. Smith offered his services to Hamid Bey, the governor of the Diyarbakir province. His offer was never accepted or even acknowledged; Smith suspected why but never divulged his suspicions. Hamid Bey had mostly a tolerant view toward the Armenians. However, possibly sensing his position was at risk, in February of 1915 he voiced his frustration with the brazenness of Armenian deserters who roamed the roofs of the city. He demanded they be turned in and many did so upon the urging of the Armenian bishop. However, this was not enough to save Hamid Bey, as he was replaced in March by Mehmed Reshid, a much more willing participant in the destruction of the Armenians.

Floys Smith, ABCFM service

Floys Smith, ABCFM service

Reshid Bey immediately began the arrest and imprisonment of leading Armenians under the premise that they had sheltered the deserters. A group of eight Greek deserters had been found hidden in an Armenian school and they “turned state’s evidence with a vengeance.” The Greeks offered the names of notable Armenians as having supplied protection. However, the names given were actually of those who had opposed the Greeks hiding in the Christian quarter.

Thus began the all too familiar genocidal plan in Diyarbakir. Armenian homes were searched for weapons. “Men were imprisoned right and left and tortured to make them confess the presence and place of concealment of arms. Some went mad under torture. The Gregorian church on several occasions was ransacked from top to bottom and underneath–nothing found.”

Dr. Smith procured some weapons so that Mrs. Smith would be left with some method of protection were he to travel to villages in the region. He had two revolvers and attempted to buy two more. However, because of the government search for weapons, the package arrived with just ammunition and a rifle. Dr. Smith attempted to get rid of these, but conditions did not allow for their disposal until two to three days later.

As the prison filled to overflowing, typhus set in, but Dr. Smith’s attempts to visit the prison, in particular to see the representative of the Standard Oil Company, Stepan Matossian, were rejected. At the gate, a guard said, “Let him die like a dog.” Those imprisoned, around 600 Armenians and Syrians, were placed on rafts in June, ostensibly to be sent to Mosul, Iraq, but were killed on the way. The Armenian bishop was horribly tortured and killed.

Conditions deteriorated further. Muslims of the city would not acknowledge Christians on the street, while Muslim children would throw stones at Christians without fear of reprisal. Even Dr. Smith was subjected to stones thrown by children.

Dr. Smith wrote, “Diyarbakir is an interior province with extremely few foreigners—an ideal setup to find out how to solve the Troublesome Armenian problem: Massacre and Deportation, or both combined. Talaat, Enver, and Jemal were fiends from hell itself.”

In May, villagers began arriving in Diyarbakir with stories of “killing and plundering by the Kurds.” Karabash, about four miles east of Diyarbakir, had a mixed population of Armenians (~10 percent) and Assyrians (~90 percent). The village had already been searched for weapons and cleared of leading men when it was surrounded and attacked by Kurds around May 18. Some of the villagers escaped to a neighboring Muslim village. There they were protected until the Muslims ran out of ammunition. Gendarmes were sent to ensure no survivors reached Diyarbakir.

Only 20 of the almost 700 from Karabash reached Diyarbakir. Dr. Smith noted wounds caused by swords, knives, axes, and bullets. In particular, one woman had her “hand severed at the wrist” and perished. Two children and one woman had deep cuts along the base of the neck that indicated attempted decapitations. A boy from a different village had a three-week old bullet wound that entered the left side of the nose and exited on the right side of the neck. Finally, a boy of about nine years had a “severed piece of skull” caused by an axe or sword. He soon died as well.

Dr. Smith had been warned by a member of parliament to not treat these victims. “Have nothing to do with these poor villagers. They are the victims of the government.” But Dr. Smith felt it his duty and refused no one who needed his care.

Thomas Mugerditchian, British consular agent who fled Diyarbakir on the eve of these events, wrote based on survivor testimony: “Throughout all these tortures the eyes of all Armenians who were so shamefully treated were turned towards one, only one, human being who could possibly come to their assistance, the American missionary Dr. Smith. This self-sacrificing man took no notice whatever of hard work and labour but did all that was humanly possible to relieve, help, comfort and cheer the dying Armenians. Drugs and medicine to those who had been through tortures, wounds and bruises, bread and even fruits to the hungry, money to the needy, all these he freely and gladly offered to all who needed them. He ministered to their last needs, prayed with the dying, closed the eyes of the dead.”

The following week, with the refugees filling the mission property, the authorities kept the premises under constant surveillance and attempted at least one search, which Dr. Smith resisted on the grounds that it was an American property. Dr. Smith sent word to Kharpert requesting Henry Riggs come to Diyarbakir; he set out on May 29, arriving on June 1. Riggs heard stories of arrests and tortures in numerous towns along the way and was inundated with terrorized visitors upon arriving in Diyarbakir. Riggs “soon found that [Dr. Smith] was doing remarkable work at the time of the crisis.” Upon his return to Kharpert, Riggs described the dire situation in Diyarbakir to Leslie Davis, the American consul, as “the worst state of terror he had ever seen: not an Armenian man dared appear on the streets; soldiers were stationed on the roofs of the houses ready to shoot at sight any Armenian.” Riggs would reflect, “This was pitiful and heartbreaking for I realized, as they did not, how utterly helpless I was to do anything to ward off the disaster that the people dreaded.”

The authorities regarded Riggs’ arrival with suspicion and worried he was actually the consul, which “wouldn’t have been at all to the liking of the local government.” Dr. Smith had asked Riggs to come to Diyarbakir more for guidance than to help with the work. It was clear from the start that Dr. Smith would not leave his post. “Come what may, he felt that he must stand by the poor people who looked to him for help and protection.”

However, the incredible strain had taken a toll on Mrs. Smith. It would be best, they felt, if she and little Arthur joined the other missionaries in Kharpert. Leaving Diyarbakir had become no easy matter. The officials gave Riggs the run-around. In addition, the young Armenian boy who had been Riggs’ driver from Kharpert had been imprisoned under the pretense that he was a deserter. Riggs knew this to be false but was powerless to do anything about it.

Riggs, Mrs. Smith, and her son, Arthur, set out for Kharpert on June 3. Upon leaving the city, the party was searched. Dr. Smith protested on the basis that the United States and Turkey were on friendly terms. But Reshid would not see him; it was stated that the capitulations had been abolished, and the search proceeded. Among the papers and letters taken from Mrs. Smith was a cipher code meant as a way for her to communicate with her husband.

The code, devised for use by the missionaries, was a simple translation of the meaning of an innocent sentence into what was really meant. There were 24 sentences on each side. Some examples supplied by Dr. Smith of the innocent phrases are as follows:

#1 Have New York drafts been received
#2 Give Preston financial aid
#3 Books sent prepaid
#4 Do not send books; await letter, etc.

Some of the true meanings were as follows:

#1 Institutions closed by government
#2 Trying to leave; government refuses guard
#3 Massacre begun
#4 Massacre in villages
#5 Personal liberty violated
#6 Foreigners in extreme danger
#7 Conditions worse
#8 How are conditions?
#9 Embassy notified
#10 Prominent Armenians imprisoned
#11 Brutal tortures
#12 Women violated
#13 Property seized

Dr. Smith felt this would mean trouble, but Riggs thought it would be overlooked. They agreed that if no word was received from Dr. Smith in three days, then something had happened.

Riggs underestimated the importance of the cipher to the Turkish officials. While it was claimed as proof of seditious acts, it became quite clear that the real threat was it being used to communicate to the outside world that there were crimes currently being carried out against the Armenians.

On the journey to Kharpert, they came upon Armenian men from Chungush with hands bound and under guard. While Riggs recognized some of the men, only one acknowledged him by holding up four fingers. Riggs did not understand the meaning of this until they came upon the most recent four victims of this group. Riggs wrote:

A little further on I came to the place where the party had evidently stopped for lunch. There lay the bodies of two elderly Armenians. They had been stripped except for their shirts, and were laid in such a position as to expose their persons to the ridicule of passersby, and on the abdomen of each was cast a large stone. They had evidently been murdered there at the noon hour and then brutal guards had stopped to leave behind them the signs not only of violence but of mockery and insult.

Riggs and Mrs. Smith arrived in Kharpert on June 5 and found that conditions had deteriorated. Riggs now felt that the actions being taken were ordered from the central government. Consul Davis sent word to Ambassador Morganthau that Riggs had traveled to Diyarbakir. Two days later, the rooms of Mrs. Smith and Henry and Ernest Riggs were searched by the authorities, and a “good many papers” were taken and sent to Diyarbakir.

Meanwhile on June 5, police arrived at the mission property in Diyarbakir. Dr. Smith protested the search to no avail. All papers, books, three revolvers, and even Dr. Smith’s passport were confiscated. He was questioned about the cipher code that had been found on Mrs. Smith, although they did let him know that she had arrived safely in Kharpert. Two of the boys that worked at the mission were taken to prison. Two days later, Badveli Hagop Andonian was also imprisoned, as were two other servants of the mission. Thus, nurse Mariam Baghdasarian, her mother (who was the mission cook), and her younger brother were the only ones left at the mission with Dr. Smith.

Mariam was a graduate of Euphrates College. The strength of character and loyalty she showed to Dr. Smith left a debt of gratitude he carried throughout the remainder of his life.

One of the servants, Mugerdich, was tortured while in prison. Under such pressure, he indicated that Dr. Smith was Armenian and that he had been the agent of Harrison Maynard to incite insurrection in Diyarbakir, as had happened at Van. A group with Maynard had passed through Diyarbakir on their way to the U.S. on leave from May 21-23. They had come under suspicion as well.

The Badveli was also tortured into confessing fictitious plots against the government. He was later murdered, as was Mugerditch. Only Mariam and her brother Ohannes were to survive.

On June 16, Dr. Smith received word that he would be deported. He asked to travel through Kharpert to meet his wife and son. This was refused, and thus Mrs. Smith was sent for. He also asked that the Baghdasarians be allowed to leave with them, but this was refused. Dr. Smith had to leave everything behind, including deeds to property that the mission owned; his passport was also withheld.

For two weeks, Mrs. Smith received no word from Dr. Smith and feared he had been imprisoned. Finally, on June 17, word was received that he was being sent out of the country and that Mrs. Smith and Arthur should be sent to join him. No American was allowed to travel with her, but Davis was able to have his former kavass, Ahmed, accompany Mrs. Smith to Diyarbakir. They arrived in Diyarbakir on June 22.

They left Diyarbakir on June 23 and arrived in Ourfa 4 days later. American missionary and Vice-Consul Francis Leslie was allowed to be responsible for the Smiths while in Ourfa for six days. They were sent on to Aleppo, where Dr. Smith was placed in prison, “a dirty, dark, sultry hole with about 15 Armenians and Kurds, mostly the former.” These prisoners told the now familiar story of marches, imprisonment, and tortures. Consul Jesse Jackson soon secured Dr. Smith’s release.

Dr. Shepard was also in Aleppo at that time and together they visited Jemal Pasha. Jemal said to Dr. Smith, “You know, Doctor, when a patient has gangrene of the leg, the doctor doesn’t pay much attention to the little toe.” Dr. Smith interpreted the leg as being the Armenian problem, and he the little toe.

Dr. Shepard helped Dr. Smith acquire the necessary papers, as he still had no passport. The Smiths were then sent on to Beirut, where they arrived on July 16. Dr. Smith received an ordinary permit at this time and thought he would be able to leave. An attempt was made on July 20, but they were held up and Dr. Smith was thrown in prison once again.

On Aug. 3, he appeared before a courtmartial. At the trial, Dr. Smith was questioned in detail about the cipher, the meaning of each phrase, and how the cipher would work. He was also asked who developed the cipher and who had copies (e.g., other missionary stations, the Board in the U.S., etc). Dr. Smith was released and, within a few days, he and his family were able to board a ship headed to Greece.

The story of Dr. and Mrs. Smith does not end here. With the approval of the Missionary Board he volunteered to serve as a physician for the Red Cross for a time on the Caucasus front caring for wounded Russian and Turkish soldiers. Then they both were sent as missionaries to the Philippines. Bessie would die during the birth of her fifth child in the Southern Philippines at the end of 1924, but Floyd Smith spent the next 30+ years there continuing his medical mission and later working as an industrial doctor for the Insular lumber Company. During World War II, he fled to the mountains on the island of Negros with Filipinos but was captured and imprisoned by the Japanese for over 3 years in various internment camps including Negros, Bacolod, Los Banos and Santo Tomas. Throughout his imprisonment he provided medical care to other prisoners. Tellingly, at Santo Tomas during the last months of the war he personally attended to 50 of the 80 internees who died from starvation.

Quite a life as a medical missionary: early in his career swept up in and a witness to the Armenian Genocide including time in a Turkish prison during WWI, and then a decades-long medical career in the Philippines culminating in capture and internment by the Japanese during WWII.

 

The author would like to thank, in particular, James Smith, grandson of Dr. Floyd Smith, who was generous in supplying me with relevant material about his grandparents. Without his support this article would not have been possible.

 

Sources

ABCFM archives (Harvard University)

Microfilm A467 Reel 0672 ABC16.9.7 v26

Microfilm A467 Reel 0716 ABC16.9.7 v25D

Maria Jacobsen, Diaries of a Danish Missionary: Harpoot, 1907-1919 (Gomidas Institute, 2001)

Henry Morgenthau, United States Diplomacy on the Bosphorus: The Diaries of Ambassador Morgenthau, 1913-1916 (Gomidas Institute, 2004)

Henry H. Riggs, Days of Tragedy in Armenia: Personal Experiences in Harpoot, 1915-1917 (Gomidas Institute, 1997)

Floyd Olin Smith, A Hawkeye Abroad: Experiences and Stories (privately published, no date)

Personal letters from the Smith family archives

Turkish Atrocities: Statements of American Missionaries on the Treatment of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey, 1915-1917 (Gomidas Institute, 1998)

United States Official Records on the Armenian Genocide, 1915-1917 (Gomidas Institute, 2004)

Thomas K. Mugerditchian, The Diyarbekir Massacres and Kurdish Atrocities (Gomidas Institute, 2013)

Currency and Exchange Rates

40 paras = 1 piaster                             trade system 1 lira = 100 piasters

5 piasters = 1 cherek                           free system 1 lira = 102.5 piasters

4 chereks = 1 mejdieh                         gold system 1 lira = 108 piasters

5 mejdieh = 1 lira                                1 Turkish lira = US$4.40

The post Portrait of Bravery: The Life and Times of Dr. Floyd Smith appeared first on Armenian Weekly.


Obituary: Onnic Marashian (1925-2014)

$
0
0

His Eminence Archbishop Oshagan and the Religious and Executive Councils announce with sorrow the passing of Onnic Marashian, a long-time servant of the Armenian Church. He was a Pillar of the Prelacy and was awarded the Prince of Cilicia insignia in recognition of his many years of service to the Armenian Church and the Eastern Prelacy. Onnic died on April 22, after a short illness.

Archbishop Mesrob Ashjian, of blessed memory, decorates Onnic Marashian with the Prince of Cilicia insignia, the highest civilian honor bestowed by the Holy See of Cilicia, in May 1996.

Archbishop Mesrob Ashjian, of blessed memory, decorates Onnic Marashian with the Prince of Cilicia insignia, the highest civilian honor bestowed by the Holy See of Cilicia, in May 1996.

A National Funeral (Azkayin Taghoum) will take place at Sts. Vartanantz Church, 461 Bergen Boulevard, in Ridgefield, N.J., on Sat., April 26, with visiting from 10-11 a.m., and funeral services at 11 a.m., with the Prelate, Archbishop Oshagan, officiating. Interment will follow at George Washington Memorial Park in Paramus. A memorial luncheon will be offered at Sts. Vartanantz Church.

Onnic is survived by his wife, Vergine; his daughter Hera and her husband John Williams; son Mardic and his wife Carol; and five grandchildren. A son, Asbed, and daughter-in-law, Sosy, and a brother, Joseph, predeceased him.

Onnic Marashian served on the Prelacy’s Executive Council for many years beginning in 1979 and continuing on until 1999. During his tenure he served as the council’s secretary for a number of years and as its chairman from 1994-99. He served as a delegate to the World General Assembly in Antelias, Lebanon; was elected to the Central Executive in Antelias; and served as a delegate to the Prelacy’s National Representative Assembly. The Prince of Cilicia medal, the highest civilian award offered by the Holy See of Cilicia, was presented to him in May 1996.

Marashian was a well-known specialist in the energy industry and was employed for many years by the McGraw-Hill Company, where he served as editor-in-chief of the influential publication Platt’s Oilgram. Following his retirement, McGraw-Hill retained him as a consultant for many years. He is the author of numerous articles in his field of expertise, where he was an internationally recognized, respected, and honored colleague.

In lieu-of-flowers donations may be made to the Eastern Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America and to Sts. Vartanantz Armenian Apostolic Church.

 

The post Obituary: Onnic Marashian (1925-2014) appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Anahid Award Ceremony Celebrates Armenian-American Writers

$
0
0

NEW YORK—Five writers of Armenian descent were honored at the Anahid Literary Awards ceremony April 4 at an event hosted by the Armenian Center at Columbia University at Faculty House in New York.

Members of the Armenian Center at Columbia University’s Board of Directors with the 2014 Anahid Literary Award recipients. (Photo credit: Dr. Robert V. Kinoian)

Members of the Armenian Center at Columbia University’s Board of Directors with the 2014 Anahid Literary Award recipients. (Photo credit: Dr. Robert V. Kinoian)

Welcoming remarks were made by master of ceremonies Peter Balakian—Rebar Professor of Humanities at Colgate University, chair of the Anahid Award Committee, and the award-winning author of many books, including his memoir Black Dog of Fate. Balakian touched on the significance of the Anahid Literary Prize, which was established 25 years ago by an anonymous donor who valued the literary tradition in relation to the continuity of Armenian culture and history.The donor, said Balakian, “must have had a sense that Armenian-American culture in the 20th century was a force of revitalization after the catastrophic events of genocide, dispersion, exile, and resettlement,” said Balakian.

He spoke about novels by Armenian-American writers during the mid-century, as well as a new generation of Armenian-American writers who emerged after World War II, including novelist Laura Kalpakian, who was the first writer to receive the Anahid Award.

“The Anahid Award continues to be an occasion for the Armenian community to be self-aware, to take note of the works of literature that are being written now, to ingest those works, and to make them part of a culture’s vitality and legacy,” said Balakian.

This year’s recipients, including Aris Janigian, Arthur Nersesian, Patricia Sarrafian Ward, Lydia Peelle (in absentia), and Michael Zadoorian, were introduced by Balakian and author Nancy Kricorian, both of whom are prior recipients of the Anahid Literary Award. Each of the authors, who are writers of novels or short fiction, read selections of their works, including The Bullet Collection, by Sarrafian Ward, who was born and raised in Beirut and is of American-Armenian-Danish heritage; Nersesian, a native New Yorker who is the author of nine novels, including The Swing Voter of Staten Island, Suicide Casanova, Manhattan, and the cult-classic The Fuck-Up; Janigian, who was born in Fresno, Calif., and is the author of two novels Bloodvine and Riverbig and co-author of Something From Nothing; and Zadoorian, who was born in Detroit, Mich., and is the author of Second Hand and The Lost Tiki Palaces of Detroit. Balakian read excerpts from Lydia Peelle’s Mule Killers and Reasons for and Advantages of Breathing.

Past winners, authors Peter Balakian and Nancy Kricorian, with the 2014 Anahid Literary Award recipients. (L-R) Peter Balakian, Patricia Sarrafian Ward, Arthur Nersesian, Nancy Kricorian, Michael Zadoorian, and Aris Janigian (Photo credit: Dr. Robert V. Kinoian)

Past winners, authors Peter Balakian and Nancy Kricorian, with the 2014 Anahid Literary Award recipients. (L-R) Peter Balakian, Patricia Sarrafian Ward, Arthur Nersesian, Nancy Kricorian, Michael Zadoorian, and Aris Janigian (Photo credit: Dr. Robert V. Kinoian)

A reception and book-signing followed, where guests had the opportunity to meet with the prize-winners.

“The Armenian Center is very proud to host the winners of the Anahid Literary Award,” said Mark Momjian, Esq. (CC’83, L ’86), chair of the Armenian Center at Columbia University. “Columbia University is a place that celebrates poetry and literature, and the list of Columbia alumni is quite remarkable—Garcia Lorca, Welty, Kerouac, Ginsberg, Wouk, as well as two Columbians who served as U.S. Poet Laureate (Louise Gluck and the late Anthony Hecht). The Armenian Center is honored to play a role in recognizing writers of Armenian ancestry who build on this tradition.”

The post Anahid Award Ceremony Celebrates Armenian-American Writers appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

An Armenian Rap on Times Square

$
0
0
A scene from the commemoration

A scene from the commemoration

99th Commemoration Brings Thousands to Times Square

From the proclamations of staunch support by high-ranking U.S. politicians to the touching lyrics of a talented Armenian-American rapper’s tribute to the millions of lives lost, the 99th commemoration of the Armenian Genocide in Times Square paid homage to the victims of 1915 and sent a resounding message that denial will not be tolerated as the Centennial memorial approaches.

An impressive crowd gathered at this year’s commemoration.

An impressive crowd gathered at this year’s commemoration.

An impressive crowd gathered at this year’s commemoration, an all-encompassing event organized by the Knights of Vartan for the past quarter of a century in one of the world’s most visible and attractive locations. While the missing survivors in the audience were a stark reminder that witnesses are succumbing to history, this year’s sizeable group of Armenian youth, from the disciplined Homenetmen Scouts who proudly held the Armenian flag throughout the duration of the program, to the members of the Areni Choir and the Higher Brass Band, to those draped in Armenian flags, an emphatic statement was made that the 1.5 million victims will not be forgotten and that the fight for genocide recognition will continue through new blood.

Appearing faithfully year after year, key U.S. politicians took to the stage once again to reaffirm their commitment to the Armenian cause and did not fail the community in expressing their firm support of genocide recognition, most recently in the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which this month passed Resolution 410, demanding that Turkey acknowledge the Armenian massacres in 1915 as “genocide.”

Chairman of the committee, Senator Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), said the resolution was passed in “undisputed terms,” and described the Armenian Genocide as “one of the darkest events in human history.”

“We must not make it the policy of the United States to turn our back on man’s inhumanity to man,” said Menendez. “And anyone who tries to create a nuanced approach serves only to empower those around the world who would use genocide as a weapon of war.”

Commending the Armenians for building a strong community in America, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) recalled the founder of the Armenian Genocide Times Square commemoration, Sam Azadian, who introduced him to the history of the Armenian Genocide when he was a newly elected assemblyman.

The program culminated in an emotional performance by R-Mean

The program culminated in an emotional performance by R-Mean

“I come here because I believe from the bottom of my heart it is our sacred duty to speak out against the terrors of the past,” said Schumer. “Remembering the innocent victims of the ‘Medz Yeghern’ helps as we strive to shine the full light of day on this historic tragedy to ensure it never happens again.”

Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-N.J.) praised the Armenians on their relentless efforts towards Armenian Genocide recognition and noted the movement’s success worldwide and in Turkey, where scholars and human rights advocates are opening sincere dialogue about the Armenian Genocide. He spoke of continued commitment not only towards genocide recognition, but humanitarian aid to the Republic of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabagh as well.

“Continue to do all of your hard work,” said Pallone. “Even though it’s the 99th year, we will not stop until we see genocide recognition.”

Following in his father’s (former Councilman Peter Vallone) footsteps, Paul Vallone (D-N.Y.) said that like his father, he was proud to support the commemoration in Times Square every year. Vallone greeted the crowd in Armenian and asserted his commitment to working with Albany and Congress to make sure the Armenian Genocide is recognized.

“Armenia is our family,” said Vallone. “It’s our faith, our culture, our language, and as we stand here in the middle of the greatest city of the world, we see that the Armenian Genocide has not been forgotten.”

Traveling straight from Armenia where he attended Armenian Genocide commemorations there, Congressman Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) said that Turkey needs to publicly accept the atrocities without the use of convoluted statements. “A genocide is a genocide and the sooner Turkey recognizes and apologizes for it, the better off everyone will be.”

Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) also expressed her efforts in Congress for U.S. recognition of the genocide and the importance of stating it by its factual name. “Genocide is genocide is genocide,” said Maloney. “Ninety-nine years is enough. We must join the world community in recognizing the genocide and the atrocious actions of Turkey.”

Remarking that it is the “responsibility” of the U.S. to recognize the Armenian Genocide, former New York City Comptroller, John Liu, said to continue the fight until an apology is achieved. “Whether it has been 100 or 200 years, this gathering will continue to take place because we know the truth and the rest of the world has to do so as well.”

“We have been here for a quarter of a century,” said Dr. Dennis Papazian, Professor Emeritus of History at the University of Michigan and Past Grand Commander of Knights of Vartan, as he looked out onto the substantial crowd in front of him in Times Square. “And we will come back for another quarter of a century until justice is done for the Armenian people.”

Also in his remarks, Papazian provided a response to the unprecedented statement of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, issued on April 23, in nine languages, in which the politician encouraged Turks and Armenians to talk to one another about the past and once again ignored the truth of the Armenian Genocide. Papazian, who has worked towards genocide recognition for decades, said he remains hopeful.

“I have witnessed a change in Turkish society where people can discuss the Armenian Genocide without being thrown in jail,” he said. “Honest Turkish scholars are now organizing conferences to shed light on the truth.”

Papazian also commented on President Barack Obama’s April 24 message, which he considered his “strongest statement” yet, despite the fact that the president continues to insist on referring to the Armenian Genocide as “Medz Yeghern.”

“Our efforts haven’t been in vain,” asserted Papazian. “We are winning the battle and we shall persist until our martyrs are properly recognized.”

The program culminated in an emotional performance by R-Mean that brought all of Times Square to its feet as members of the audience, as well as passersby, waved peace signs in the air to the lyrics of his song, “Open Wounds.” Hailing from Los Angeles, the young Armenian-American rapper has been an active supporter of genocide recognition and spreading awareness outside of the Armenian community, in particular with reputable individuals in the music and entertainment industry. He hopes to educate the masses through hip-hop music, which he considers to be the “voice of the oppressed, the voice of the struggle, and the voice of the youth.”

“The goal of the song ‘Open Wounds’ and the ‘Open Wounds 1915 Movement’ is to raise awareness for the youth who are our future and the non-Armenians who enjoy listening to good music with a positive message,” said R-Mean. “In a sense, this is doing the exact opposite of what the Turkish government has been trying to do all these years by erasing it from the history books.”

Archbishop Oshagan Choloyan, Prelate of Armenian Church of America (Eastern), gave the invocation and Archbishop Khajag Barsamian, Primate of the Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern), delivered the benediction. Other clergy in attendance included Very Reverend Thomas Garabedian of the Armenian Catholic Eparchy of the United States and Canada and Reverend Haig Kherlopian of the Armenian Evangelical Church of New York.

Susan Rosenblatt from the Jewish Press delivered remarks, as well as Lisa Kradjian, Grand Matron of the Daughters of Vartan. Delivering remarks on behalf of the co-sponsors of the commemoration were Kim Yacoubian (AGBU), Alex Karapetian (Armenian Assembly), Hagop Ajemian (Hunchakian Party), Dr. Vagheenag Tarpinian (ADL), and Anahid Urguluyan (ANCA).

The winners of this year’s Knights of Vartan essay contest were announced at the program: Alina Toporas, 1st place (Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pa., resident), Elizabeth Ray, 2nd place (St. Agnes Academy, Memphis, Tenn., resident), and Christopher Artun, 3rd place (Townsend Harris High School, Little Neck, N.Y., resident).

The Areni Choir, under the direction of Dr. Armine Vardanian, sang the national anthems of the United States and Armenia, as well as “God Bless America,” while the Higher Brass Band, under the direction of Samuel Nersesian, accompanied the singers.

The Armenian Radio Hour of New Jersey, led by the director, Professor Vartan Abdo, streamed the event live in video format worldwide, reaching over 20,000 people, with the assistance of his dedicated volunteer staff.

The 99th Armenian Genocide commemoration in Times Square was organized by the Mid-Atlantic chapters of the Knights and Daughters of Vartan, and was co-sponsored by the Armenian General Benevolent Union, the Armenian Assembly of America, the Armenian National Committee of America, the ADL-Ramgavars, and the Armenian Council of America.

Participating organizations included the Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern), Prelacy of the Armenian Church, Armenian Missionary Association of America, Armenian Presbyterian Church, the Armenian Evangelical Church, the Armenian Catholic Eparchy for U.S. and Canada, and numerous Armenian youth organizations, including the Armenian Church Youth Organization of America, the Armenian Youth Federation, the Tekeyan Cultural Association, Homenetmen Scouts, Hamazkayin Cultural Association, Noyan Tapan of Brooklyn, Rutgers University Armenian Club, Columbia University Armenian Club, and the Armenian Students’ Association.

Dr. Mary Papazian, president of Southern Connecticut State University, and Armen McOmber, New Jersey attorney, served as MCs.

 

 

The post An Armenian Rap on Times Square appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

ANC-NY Holds Fundraiser for Kessab

$
0
0

By Katrina Shakarian

On Sat., April 12, Armenians across the tri-state area gathered at Almayass restaurant/lounge in Manhattan for a “Fundraiser for Kessab,” and raised nearly $4,000 in aid to Syrian-Armenians displaced by the current rebel incursion into the northwestern province of Latakia. The fundraiser was co-sponsored by the Armenian National Committee (ANC) of New York and the Armenian Youth Federation (AYF) New York chapter.

A scene from the fundraiser

A scene from the fundraiser

Latakia includes Kessab (Kasab), an Armenian-Christian village on the Mediterranean Sea, that until recently was unscathed by the infighting and destruction that has transformed other sections of the country. All of the area’s residents, mostly Armenians, were forced to evacuate when rebel forces launched their coastal offensive from Turkey in March. Approximately 1,550 displaced families from Kessab have taken refuge in the city of Latakia, which is under Syrian government control. Kessab Armenians have joined the ranks of approximately two million Syrians rendered refugees by this conflict, now in its fourth year.

Present at the fundraiser were master of ceremonies Valot Atakhanian of ANC-NY and Father Nareg Terterian, a native of Kessab, and the current pastor of St. Sarkis Armenian Apostolic Church in Douglaston, N.Y. Father Nareg relayed up-to-date information about the local Armenian population, attained from his contacts on the ground. Lebanese-Armenian singer and musical director Kevork Hadjian closed the program with song.

Kevork Hadjian (R) closed the program with song.

Kevork Hadjian (R) closed the program with song.

For Armenians, the emptying of this historic swath of land, perhaps permanently, stirs up painful memories of the 1915 genocide from which their ancestors escaped; they survived and sought refuge in Kessab’s idyllic landscape. Tony Vartanian of ANC-NY thanked attendees for contributing to the fundraiser and shared news of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s recent adoption of the Armenian Genocide Resolution. Spearheaded by New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez (D), the resolution seeks to ensure that America’s foreign policy reflects and reinforces the lessons, documented in the U.S. record, of the still-unacknowledged genocide.

Although this event was a success, the important work of supporting Syrian-Armenians in their time of need continues. Both New York Chapters of ANC and AYF encourage readers to stay involved.

The post ANC-NY Holds Fundraiser for Kessab appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Legerdemain

$
0
0

Special for the Armenian Weekly

No other word seems to fit Erdogan’s masterful slight-of-hand performance on the crowded global stage of diplomatic illusionist routines. As seasoned entertainers of a genre bordering on the macabre, Erdogan and his trusted assistant, Davutoglu, with their latest performance—as an unsolicited “encore” right after their disastrous production of the Kessab tragedy—proved to be masters of timing, conjuring snow-white doves of peace out of their coal-black diplomatic top hats.

Like all illusionists, no matter how talented, the Erdogan-Davutoglu team must rely on the credulity of its audience. The target audience in this case—considering the multi-lingual versions of the script presented to the world (including Eastern and Western Armenian)—seems to be the international community whose perception of the Armenian Genocide, after 99 years, tends to be generally vague and subjective, depending largely on national/religious credos and geopolitical considerations, hence more susceptible to expert showmanship. This is not to say that all Armenians are immune to a cleverly staged legerdemain scam. Far from it; like all victims thirsty for justice, many do cling to any gesture of sympathy, in this case “condolences” tendered to the scattered progeny of the one-and-a-half million victims by the perpetrator himself, as an expression of “shared pain”…

Customarily, condolences are tendered after the demise of the subject in question. Perhaps the Erdogan-Davutoglu team needs to be reminded that the target of the planned and executed Armenian Genocide was the Armenian nation, not just one-and-a-half million slaughtered Ottoman-Armenian men, women, and children. The Pan-Turanian racist dreams of the Ittihad leadership could be realized only through the total annihilation of Armenia, as patrimony, people, culture, and history, clearing the road to an imaginary Pan-Turanian Turkish empire reaching the gates of China.

Since that goal was not reached, successive Turkish regimes dubbed surviving Armenia and Armenians as eternal enemies, targeted for final removal from the map and history books—at least in the Kemalist and post-Kemalist edited “history” books. Hence, the ongoing genocidal policies, in the form of forced assimilation of whatever was left still standing and breathing—monuments, people, names of geographic landmarks, even animals and plants—that remotely reminded the living of an Armenian presence in Asia Minor.

By tendering “condolences” and extending a white-gloved diplomatic hand of “friendship” covering the stains of the rivers of innocent blood spilled a century ago, the Erdogan-Davutoglu team, still in denial of the ongoing First Genocide of the 20th century, attempts to bury alive the Armenian Case, instead of putting an end to this macabre parody of denial, thereby washing its hands of a brutal past and discussion of reparations.

Right after Erdogan’s tiresome performance of diplomatic legerdemain, Davutoglu, addressing his remarks to the Republic of Armenia, stated that there can be no improvement whatsoever in Turkish-Armenian relations without a final settlement of the Nagorno-Karabagh issue… What he really meant was the Final Solution of the Armenian issue. Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme! Need we say more?

The post Legerdemain appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

White House Pledges to Release Armenian Genocide Orphan Rug for Display

$
0
0

WASHINGTON, DC—The Obama Administration has advised Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) that the White House will be making the Armenian Orphan Rug—woven by young survivors of the Armenian Genocide and presented as a gift to President Calvin Coolidge in appreciation of U.S. relief efforts for the survivors of this crime—available for public display at an event to be held as early as Fall, 2014, reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

President Calvin Coolidge pictured standing on the rug with Near East Relief Vice-Chairman, Dr. John Finley. Source: Barton, Story of Near East Relief, 362. Courtesy: The Missak Kelechian Collection. As published in “President Calvin Coolidge and the Armenian Orphan Rug," by Dr. Hagop Martin Deranian.

President Calvin Coolidge pictured standing on the rug with Near East Relief Vice-Chairman, Dr. John Finley. Source: Barton, Story of Near East Relief, 362. Courtesy: The Missak Kelechian Collection. As published in “President Calvin Coolidge and the Armenian Orphan Rug,” by Dr. Hagop Martin Deranian.

The announcement was welcomed by both Congressman Schiff and Senator Markey, who had joined with Congressional colleagues in petitioning for the release of the iconic symbol of U.S. humanitarian assistance following reports that the White House had refused to allow its display at an event that was to be held at the Smithsonian Institute in December, 2013.

“Since first raising this issue with the Administration, I have worked diligently with the White House to find a way for the Ghazir rug to be sensitively and appropriately displayed,” said Rep. Schiff. “Today, I’m pleased to be able to say that planning is underway for the Armenian Orphan Rug to be displayed as early as this Fall.  I have worked out with the White House that the display will take place in a venue that is open to the general public, and I appreciate their willingness to place this significant artifact on display for all to see.”

Sen. Markey concurred, noting that “the Armenian Orphan Rug is an important symbol of the longstanding friendship between America and Armenia. Displaying this significant piece of history will serve as reminder that we will never forget the Armenian Genocide and highlight the continued need to work towards its proper recognition. I commend President Obama and the White House for working with me and my Congressional colleagues to ensure that this rug is given the historic exhibition it truly deserves.”

The news was also hailed by Congressman David Valadao (R-CA), who, along with Congressman Schiff, is lead sponsor of the Armenian Genocide Resolution (H.Res.227) and led a bipartisan Congressional effort to secure the release of the Armenian Orphan Rug. “For over a decade, Armenian-American organizations have been asking the White House and the State Department to display the Ghazir Rug publically,” said Rep. Valadao.  “Today’s announcement by the White House is an important first step towards ensuring the Armenian Genocide is recognized by our current Administration. My Congressional District, CA-21, is home to a large population of Armenian-Americans, who have a strong presence in our community. As their Representative, I am pleased the Administration has decided to fulfill our request to publicly display the rug. The Armenian Orphan Rug is a shared piece of American and Armenian history that belongs to the American people.”

ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian warmly welcomed the longstanding efforts of Rep. Schiff, Senator Markey, and Rep. Valadao to seek the public, prominent display of the rug, but noted that vigilance remains the key to ensuring that the rug presentation does, in fact, take place.

“It’s a testament to the Turkish government’s continuing grip over the Obama Administration’s policy on the Armenian Genocide that it has taken years of Congressional and community effort to secure the public display of a rug woven by the child survivors of this crime—a unique artifact that, it must be stressed, is a piece of U.S. property and a meaningful part of American history,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. “We applaud the efforts of Congressman Schiff, Senator Markey, Rep. Valadao and others to secure the public display of this rug and will continue to track this matter closely in the coming weeks and months.”

The controversy surrounding the Armenian orphan rug erupted in October, 2013, when the Washington Post and National Public Radio reported the White House’s abrupt and unexplained reversal of its agreement to lend the rug for a December 16, 2013, exhibition at the Smithsonian Institute, organized in cooperation with the Armenian Cultural Foundation and the Armenian Rug Society. In an interview with Public Radio International (PRI), Washington Post Art Critic Philip Kennicott noted that while the White House has not offered an explanation for the reversal in decision, it is likely due to the U.S. government’s deference to Turkey’s international campaign of genocide denial.

Click here to listen to the PRI interview in its entirety:
http://youtu.be/jlIhbS78-Yg

Following these initial reports, the ANCA organized a nationwide grassroots campaign, worked with Members of Congress, and consulted with the Administration, making the case to all relevant stakeholders for the prominent and permanent public display of this historic rug.

In November, 2013, a bipartisan group of over 30 U.S. Representatives, led by Representatives Schiff and Valadao, called on the White House to reverse its decision.  Senator Markey and Representatives Brad Sherman (D-CA) and Nikki Tsongas (D-MA) also sent personal letters urging the White House to take action.

During an ANCA Western Region press conference timed with President Obama’s visit to Los Angeles on November 26, 2013, His Eminence Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian, Prelate of the Western Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church noted, “The rug was a gracious gesture symbolizing the friendship between the American and Armenian peoples. It is part of American history. Keeping it locked away in storage is not only insulting to the orphaned girls who painstakingly crafted this beautiful work of art, it also represents a shameful effort to cover up, at the urging of genocide-deniers in Ankara, a truly proud chapter of American history.”

The White House response at that time was vague—with National Security Staff Assistant Press Secretary Laura Lucas Magnuson offering the following comment to the Asbarez Armenian Newspaper: “The Ghazir rug is a reminder of the close relationship between the peoples of Armenia and the United States. We regret that it is not possible to loan it out at this time.” A statement with the same exact wording was released to the Washington Post at the time.

LA Times reporter Richard Simon reported the White House change of position, with Magnuson affirming that the White House has “been working with Congressman Schiff on this issue for several months and appreciate his working with us to showcase this important artifact in a way that appropriately highlights the spirit in which it was given to the White House for U.S. involvement in assisting Armenian refugees.”

Simon’s complete Los Angeles Times article is available at:
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-armenian-rug-white-house-20140430,0,1080767.story#ixzz30OhpnJ27

The Armenian orphan rug measures 11′ 7″ x 18′ 5″ and is comprised of 4,404,206 individual knots. It took Armenian girls in the Ghazir Orphanage of Near East Relief ten months to weave. The rug was delivered to President Coolidge on December 4, 1925, in time for Christmas, with a label on the back of the rug, which reads “IN GOLDEN RULE GRATITUDE TO PRESIDENT COOLIDGE.”

According to Missak Kelechian, an expert on this topic, the gift of the Armenian Orphan rug was widely covered in U.S. media, including in the New York Times in 1925 and the Washington Post in 1926.

Kelechian describes the journey of the rug in a CNN clip available here.
http://youtu.be/YyDoZl7bYN8

Additional information about the history of the Armenian Orphan Rug is available in Dr. Hagop Martin Deranian’s book, President Coolidge and the Armenian Orphan Rug, published on October 20, 2013, by the Armenian Cultural Foundation.

The post White House Pledges to Release Armenian Genocide Orphan Rug for Display appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Obituary: Sano Themia Halo (1909-2014)

$
0
0

 

Sano Themia Halo, (1909-2014) one of the last survivors of the Pontic Greek Genocide in Ottoman Turkey, died peacefully at home in her sleep on April 28, 2014, just two weeks shy of her 105th birthday.

Although Ms. Halo came from a place in the world that was too small to be depicted on a map, as the subject of the memoir, Not Even My Name, she became known to Pontic Greeks worldwide, as the Yia Yia (grandmother) of all Pontians. To her family and friends she was a warm, sensitive, often humorous, and caring mother, grandmother, and great grandmother.

Sano Themia Halo (1909-2014)

Sano Themia Halo (1909-2014)

The only known survivor of her family, Ms. Halo’s extraordinary memory brought to life the details of how the Pontic Greeks lived in mountain villages of the Black Sea region of Turkey in the early 20th Century, and her community’s devastating death march to exile in 1920. To help her survive, her mother left 10-year-old Themia, with a woman who promised to care for her, in a small hamlet in southern Turkey. After her mother’s death, young Themia was treated as a slave. With the loss of her family, community, and finally her name, changed to Sano by her cruel keeper, Sano ran away to Diyarbakir at age 12. There an Armenian family took her in. When they fled to Aleppo, Syria to avoid further massacres, they took young Sano with them as their daughter.

Sano’s future husband, Abraham, an Assyrian who had also fled Turkey and emigrated to the U.S. in 1905, had returned to Aleppo in 1925 to visit exiled cousins and to find a bride. To give Sano a chance at a free life in America, at just 15 years old, her Armenian family arranged Sano’s marriage to 45-year-old Abraham. On their marriage and arrival in New York City, Sano became mother to Farage, Abraham’s 10-year-old son from a previous marriage. Sano and Abraham raised 10 children of their own.

When asked if she wanted restitution from the Turkish government for the loss of her family and her home, Ms. Halo responded that she wanted an apology from the Turkish government. “We had everything to live for and they sent us to die on the roads,” she said.

In 2002, Ms. Halo was given the New York Governor’s Award for Excellence in Honor of Women’s History Month, Honoring Women of Courage and Vision, for making known to the American public for the first time, the history and tragic fate of the Pontic Greeks, a people who had made Asia Minor their home for almost 3,000 years, until their massacre, death marches to exile, and finally the Exchange of Populations in 1923 pursuant to the Treaty of Lausanne.

Although a resident of New York City since her arrival in 1925, neither Ms. Halo, nor most of the country, was aware that over 40,000 Pontic Greeks made their homes in Astoria, L.I., with further Pontian communities in Connecticut, Chicago, Canada and elsewhere.

In 2009, for her 100th Birthday, Greece awarded Ms. Halo and her daughter, Thea, honorary Greek citizenship. “Now everyone will know I am Greek,” Ms. Halo said, referring to a U.S. passport that depicted her place of origin as Turkey, without identifying her as a Greek.

In 1989, she made a pilgrimage with her daughter, Thea, back to Turkey to find her home. “Everyone treated me like family,” she said of the Turks they met along the way.” Although Ms. Halo’s story of loss of family, home, country, and finally even her language and her name was so tragic, she never held any animosity towards the Turkish people. She said they had lived side by side in peace. “They are people like any other people. They want to raise their families and prosper. You must place the blame where blame belongs,” she said, “with the Turkish government. Ataturk. He was the one. Not the only one. But he was the one.”

The Ottoman genocide of over three million of their Christian citizens: Greeks, Armenians, and Assyrians under the Young Turk and Kemalist regimes from 1913-1923 took the lives of 353,000 of the 700,000 Pontic Greeks, and a further 700,000 Greeks of Ottoman Turkey. It also took the lives of 275,000 Assyrians, more than half their population, and 1.5 million Armenians.

Ms. Halo had long opined, “If I could only write, I’d tell the world what happened.” Although her daughter Thea had made her career as a painter, after their trip to Turkey, Thea decided to be her mother’s voice. Not Even My Name was published by Picador, an imprint of St. Martin’s Press, in 2000.

Sano Halo is also featured in a number of documentaries, and has received numerous other honors and awards in the U.S., Canada, and in Greece. The Sano Themia Halo Pontian Heritage Foundation was established by her daughter Thea with the intention of building a living museum in Greece to help future generations know how the Pontic Greeks lived in the Pontic Mountains along the Black Sea.

In 1976 Ms. Halo moved to Monroe, N.Y. where she spent the last 37 years of her life. Above all, Ms. Halo was devoted to her family. She often said, “My family is my life.” She is survived by seven of her ten children, plus her many grand- and great-grandchildren, and one great-great grandchild.

The post Obituary: Sano Themia Halo (1909-2014) appeared first on Armenian Weekly.


Erdogan’s Message: Where Do We Go From Here?

$
0
0

On April 23, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan sent a message of condolence in eight languages to Armenians worldwide, for their forefathers who lost their lives in 1915. As this was an unprecedented and unexpected gesture by a Turkish statesman, Armenians in Armenia, the diaspora, and within Turkey reacted with a wide range of emotions and opinions. Some dismissed it as a cynical move and a new version of continued denial of the genocide; some saw it as a smart political move and an effective delay tactic to avert the pressure of the Centennial of the genocide next year; others optimistically saw it as a change in direction by Turkey in facing its history, hoping for increased dialogue and a resolution of issues; and a few sycophants went as far as to take out newspaper ads thanking the prime minister, or suggesting that he be considered for the Nobel Peace Prize. So, where do we go from here?

One can find many faults with Erdogan’s message. It could be interpreted as one more fitting for the victims of a natural disaster, such as an earthquake or flood, or a man-made accident, such as a train accident, instead of murdered victims of a state-planned annihilation of an entire people that has disappeared from its 4,000-year-old historic homeland. One can speculate about the reasons behind such a message: Was it calculated, insincere, or from pressure by the U.S., so that President Obama would not use the “G” word. But at the end of the day, no matter what the motive, whether genuine or not, one must acknowledge that this is the first time a Turkish leader has said something mildly humane about the Armenian Genocide victims of 1915, instead of complete denial or insults that were the norm for the past 99 years. More significantly, certain terms used in the message are really encouraging, welcome and irreversible, such as acknowledging the historic significance of April 24 for all the Armenians around the world, or acknowledging the inhumane consequences of the “relocation.” And therefore, it should be recognized as a small step in the right direction—provided that it is followed immediately by real, concrete action and further evidence of a change of direction toward facing history, justice, and restitution. The next 12 months will tell if this is the case or not.

It is not easy for a statesman to suddenly reverse a nearly century-old course of denial, which included brainwashing its citizens for four generations, and threats against anyone or any state that disagreed with its lies about 1915. But every journey of 10,000 miles starts with a small step. In a previous article I had suggested eight steps that Turkey could take within the next year—immediately and without even acknowledging the genocide—if there truly was goodwill in resolving historical wrongs:

1. Open the border with Armenia without any preconditions. Rename the Alican border-crossing the Hrant Dink Gate in honor of the heroic advocate for dialogue.

2. Grant citizenship to the living descendants of the deported Ottoman-Armenian citizens.

3. Clean up the textbooks at all levels of the educational system by eliminating the falsifications, hate-mongering, and discrimination against the Armenians, and start teaching the correct facts about 1915.

4. Initiate a state program through the Ministry of Culture and Tourism to reconstruct or restore the more than 2,000 destroyed or deteriorating Armenian monasteries and churches, and return them to their rightful owner, the Armenian Church.

5. Offer a symbolic but meaningful apology to the Armenian people for the crimes of 1915 by returning Mount Ararat and Ani to Armenia, perhaps as part of a minor border revision and territorial exchange based on equivalent land area.

6. Open up to the public the archival documents related to the deportation/liquidation records and the Ottoman property deeds related to the deported Armenians.

7. Allow the compensation cases by descendants of Ottoman-Armenian citizens to proceed in Turkish and international courts.

8. Offer free transit and duty-free port facilities for Armenia at a Black Sea city such as Trabzon and Rize, as partial compensation for the economic losses of the Ottoman-Armenian citizens.

I am aware that some of these steps have already been taken or been considered by Turkish government officials. Discussions about granting of citizenship and restoring a few of the churches and monasteries have started—albeit as “museums,” and usually without mentioning their Armenian origins. Opening the border with Armenia without being held hostage by third countries would be a win-win for both states. A sure sign that Erdogan’s message is sincere could be the elimination of the names of the streets, schools, mosques, and neighborhoods named after the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) leaders Talat, Enver, and Djemal. But we know that there are still Turkish “deep state” leaders (recently released from jail by Erdogan) who have formed Talat Pasha Committees, or erected statues of such notorius murderers as Topal (Lame) Osman, famous for throwing Armenians overboard from boats into the Black Sea, or even worse, for throwing Pontic Greeks into the boiler rooms of the ships through the funnels.

Another indication of Erdogan’s sincerity in changing direction would be to stop the ridiculous publications and conferences by the state-financed Turkish Historic Society. Their latest publication had the number of perished Armenians during the genocide down to 8,000, and all had “died due to illness.” Their latest conference in Van in April 2014, where 35 so-called professors presented papers, was attended by only 7 people. One of the papers claimed that the 235 intellectuals arrested on April 24, 1915 were all very well treated, well fed and cared for in Ayas and Cankiri, and that all returned to Istanbul within a few months, “without even a tiny scratch on their bodies.”

Finally, Erdogan must understand that there is no need to assemble an international historic commission to prove the veracity of the genocide, as this has already been done for him by scholars worldwide using the Ottoman-Turkish and international archives. If the Turkish objective of the historic commission is to prove that Armenians were indeed fomenting rebellion, and thereby to justify the decision of relocation and wholesale massacres, these are already documented and open in Armenian and international archives. And yes, there have been localized revenge massacres of Moslems by Armenian volunteer troops entering Anatolia with the Russian army in 1916, but after the 1915 genocide had already taken place. He can assemble a commission within Turkey, as there are now enough credible Turkish scholars who can overcome the lies spread by the lackeys at the Turkish Historical Society. But he must understand that there are still hidden deportation/liquidation records from the 33 Ottoman provinces, as well as the Ottoman property land registry and deed records, still banned by the Turkish Army Chief of staff. Yes, there is a need for an international commission, not to establish the truths of 1915 but to deal with the consequences of the truths and restitution of justice.

Of course, it is essential for Erdogan and the Turkish state to correctly deal with the trauma and pain of the murdered—and not dead—victims of 1915, as he referred to in his message. But the issue is much more than that. There is the bigger issue of a massive plunder, transfer of wealth, land, and assets that resulted from the murder of these victims.  The president of the Turkish state today resides in the home of the Kasapyan family. A well-known Turkish newspaper editor owns the historic Varakavank Monastery near Van, and the entire village where Armenians lived until 1915. The Turkish state today owns the land of more than 4,000 Armenian churches and schools active before 1915. Turkish and Kurdish notables seized—and still possess—hundreds of thousands of houses, shops, stores, farms, orchards, vineyards, factories, warehouses, and mines owned by the Armenians before 1915. This massive plunder is not the result of a state conquering a foreign state; it is because a state decided to kill its own citizens and take their assets, followed by a series of legislation to legalize the robbery. This issue has nothing to do with whether the murders are defined as “genocide” or not, and this must be addressed by the Turkish state regardless, through revised legislation and a return of the assets to the rightful owners and heirs.

While Erdogan and Turkey’s leaders have a lot of work to do to confront the past, Armenians cannot afford to just meet among themselves or expect third-country politicians to take up their cause for them. As an advocate of direct dialogue with our adversaries, I suggest increased contact with Turks, Kurds, and the new emerging reality of the “hidden Armenians”—toward building trust, understanding, and a common “body of knowledge.” Armenian opinion-makers, media, academia, lawyers, artists, filmmakers, engineers, and architects, NGOs and other organizations must make contact with their counterparts in Turkey through conferences, cultural events, media and student exchanges, reconstruction projects, and jointly organized April 24 commemorations within Turkey. Thanks to a number of such initiatives and individuals, the number of opinion-makers and open-minded people who have become aware of the truth has grown dramatically. We are all aware that the problem is within Turkey, but we must realize that the solution is within Turkey as well. It is my hope that Erdogan’s message is a real step in the right direction, which will be through the steps described above.

The post Erdogan’s Message: Where Do We Go From Here? appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Calif. Assembly Panel Votes to Support Artsakh Independence

$
0
0

ANCA-WR Chair Nora Hovsepian Testifies in Support of Landmark Resolution (AJR 32); Full Assembly Vote Set for May 8

SACRAMENTO, Calif.—The California State Assembly Rules Committee on cast a historic vote on May 5 supporting and encouraging Artsakh’s (Nagorno Karabagh) continuing efforts to develop as a free and independent nation, and urging the President and Congress of the United States to support the self-determination and democratic independence of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, reported the Armenian National Committee of America – Western Region. AJR 32, introduced by Assemblymember Mike Gatto, was adopted by a vote of 9 yes, 1 no, and 1 member who did not vote and will now move to the full Assembly floor for a vote scheduled for May 8, 2014.

“We are grateful to Assemblymember Mike Gatto for introducing this important resolution calling on the state of California to take a moral stand in line with American ideals of self-determination and freedom by recognizing the independence of Artsakh,” states ANCA-WR Chair, Nora Hovsepian, who offered testimony in support of the resolution at the committee hearing. “We look forward to California joining the States of Rhode Island, Maine, Massachusetts and Louisiana in supporting the righteous quest of our brethren in Artsakh for a life of peace and prosperity on their ancestral lands.”

AJR 32 lead author, Assemblymember Gatto was joined by Co-Author Assemblymember Katcho Achadjian (R-Calif.), Assemblymembers Adrin Nazarian (D-Calif.), Scott Wilk (R-Calif.) and Cheryl Brown (D-Calif.) in offering testimony in support of the measure. Joining Hovsepian in testifying on behalf of California’s over 1 million Armenian American community were Alina Nalbantyan, who hails from the Shahoumian region of Artsakh, and Sevak Khatchatourian from the Armenian Council of America.

The Armenian National Committee of America – Western Region (ANCA-WR) has been instrumental in the passage of AJR 32, working closely with Assemblymember Mike Gatto and the Rules Committee to ensure a sound understanding of the facts. “It has been my privilege to work with the leaders of the local Armenian American community and their outstanding representatives on this important resolution,” said Gatto. The ANCA-WR launched an action alert on this resolution and in a matter of a few days, Armenian-Americans from all parts of California contacted their representatives on the Rules Committee urging their members to vote in favor of AJR 32, in support of the Republic of Artakh’s independence. More than 2,500 letters were sent to the members of the Rules Committee.

California is home to tens of thousands of Armenian-Americans who are refugees of pogroms against Armenians in Sumgait (1988), Kirovabad (1988), and Baku (1990), and the ethnic-cleansing of the Armenian population of Azerbaijan. These pogroms set the stage for two decades of aggression by Azerbaijan, during which it launched and lost a war against Nagorno Karabakh, and later used its oil wealth to buy a massive military arsenal that its leaders, to this day, vow to use to renew their attempts to conquer a Christian people that have lived on these lands for thousands of years and, after great challenges, has flourished in freedom from Soviet oppression for more than 20 years.

“I stand with the freedom loving people of Artsakh in support of AJR 32. We will continue to speak out until Artsakh is free,” stated Assemblymember Scott Wilk who set the record straight during the hearing and refuted the fallacies presented by the Azeri lobby.

Since declaring independence in 1991, Artsakh has successfully conducted five parliamentary and five presidential elections that have been praised by international observers as free, fair and transparent. The most recent presidential election held in July 2012 was favorably received by more than 80 international observers from two dozen countries, including the United States. Election observers included the former Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick Lynch and Canadian Parliamentarian Jim Karygianni.

On Thursday, May 8, AJR 32 will be voted on by the full California State Assembly.

The post Calif. Assembly Panel Votes to Support Artsakh Independence appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

ANCA: Warlick Statement on Nagorno Karabakh ‘Offers Nothing New’

$
0
0

WASHINGTON—Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) Executive Director Aram Hamparian issued the following comment in response to U.S. Ambassador James Warlick’s U.S. policy statement titled, “Nagorno-Karabakh: The Keys to a Settlement.”

U.S. Ambassador James Warlick

U.S. Ambassador James Warlick

“The Warlick plan proposed today offers little new.

The framework it presents is neither morally acceptable nor practically sustainable.

While we do welcome the renewed focus on the centrality of status, at a fundamental level, this plan falls far short of our American ideal of democratic self-determination, the enduring principle upon which our nation was founded and through which more than one hundred new countries have emerged over the past half century.

Using the profoundly incendiary and patently inaccurate language of “occupation,” this proposed framework again effectively calls upon Nagorno Karabakh and Armenia—the victims of Baku’s war of aggression – to make up-front, strategic security concessions in return for entirely undefined and easily reversible promises by an increasingly belligerent Azerbaijani government.

We remain hopeful in the overall prospects for an OSCE-brokered peace, are disappointed by the status and security asymmetry in this particular proposal, and look forward to engaging, as meaningful stakeholders, in a more balanced, inclusive and democratic framework for the future of the independent Republic of Nagorno Karabakh. Over-riding Baku’s veto on Nagorno Karabakh’s full and direct participation in all peace talks should, of course, be the first item on the OSCE’s agenda.”

Ambassador Warlick’s full statement, delivered at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, is provided below and available at: http://armenia.usembassy.gov/news050714.html

Ambassador James Warlick Nagorno-Karabakh: The Keys to a Settlement

May 7, 2014

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Wednesday, May 7, 9 a.m.

Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen:

Thank you for joining me this morning. I recognize a number of you who have served as counsel or sounding-board for me over the past eight months and I want to extend a special thanks to you.

Let me start by saying that I do not want to revisit the history of the conflict. Our goal should be to find a pragmatic way forward to bring about a lasting settlement.

Although I speak to you today as the U.S. co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, I do not speak for the co-chairs. My message to you is a statement of official U.S. government policy that guides our engagement as we help the parties find peace.

And peace is within reach. The sides have come to a point where their positions on the way forward are not that far apart. They have almost reached agreement on several occasions – most recently in 2011. And when they inevitably returned to the negotiating table after each failed round, the building blocks of the next “big idea” were similar to the last time.

There is a body of principles, understandings, and documents already on the table that lay out a deal, and no one has suggested we abandon them. The challenge is to find a way to help the sides take that last, bold step forward to bridge their remaining differences and deliver the peace and stability that their populations deserve.

For two decades, however, peace has been elusive. All parties distrust each other and a generation of young people has grown up in Armenia and Azerbaijan with no first-hand experience of each other. As many have noted, older generations remember a time when Armenians and Azerbaijanis lived side-by-side and differences did not need to be resolved through the barrel of a gun.

As Churchill once reminded us, “you negotiate peace with your enemies, not with your friends.” The key to any successful negotiation is for all parties to conclude that they have won something, and in the case of the Armenians and Azerbaijanis there is no question that a deal will unlock a new era of prosperity across the region. The benefits of peace far outweigh the costs of continued stalemate, and avoid the catastrophic consequences of renewed hostilities.

Armenia would immediately benefit from open borders, greater security, and new opportunities to trade, travel, and engage with all its neighbors.

Azerbaijan would eliminate a key impediment to its growth as a player on the world stage, regional trade hub, and strong security partner, while giving hundreds of thousands of refugees and internally displaced persons a prospect for reconciliation and return.

The thousands of people living in Nagorno-Karabakh would be freed from the prison of isolation and dependence.

A peace agreement, properly designed and implemented, would also eliminate the tragic, steady stream of casualties – both military and civilian – along the border and the Line of Contact. Numbers are hard to pin down, but there have already been at least a dozen killed and even more injured on the front lines this year so far. This is unacceptable.

No less significant is the huge financial burden that military readiness and a growing arms race imposes on national budgets – a peace dividend that, used more productively, could itself be a game changer for both Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Next week will mark 20 years since a ceasefire agreement was signed. While we can take some pride in having avoided a return to outright war, we must also agree that the current state of affairs is unacceptable, and unsustainable.

Perpetual negotiations, periodic outbreaks of violence, the isolation of Armenia and the people living in Nagorno-Karabakh, frustration in Azerbaijan and anger among its populations of IDPs – this is not a recipe for peace or stability and it is certainly not the path to prosperity.

The people of the region deserve better.

***

I began this job last September with a trip to the region, with visits to Baku and Yerevan to meet the two presidents and their foreign ministers. I also made a side trip to Nagorno-Karabakh to join Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk’s team for an OSCE monitoring mission along the Line of Contact on the road between Agdam and Gindarkh.

I joined the team on the west side of the Line of Contact, and got my first glimpse of the front lines. I saw the bleak reality faced by young soldiers on both sides of this Line, who live and work behind trenches and berms, with nothing but barbed wire and land mines keeping them apart.

The sides live under threat from sniper fire and landmines. They are concerned for the lives of their civilian populations and their access to farmland, cemeteries, and buildings that happen to fall “too close” to the Line of Contact or the international border between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

OSCE monitors have been working for two decades to keep an eye on this fragile peace, but have neither the mandate nor the resources to put a stop to the frequent casualties, or even to identify responsibility.

The sides themselves report thousands of ceasefire violations every year, but have been unable to reach agreement on any means of reducing that tally.

I have also traveled throughout Nagorno-Karabakh itself, where I have met with the de facto authorities to hear their views. I plan to do so again next week with the other co-chairs. There is no question that any enduring peace agreement must reflect the views of all affected parties if it is to succeed.

In the capitals, I have heard a more reassuring message. Both presidents want to make progress. Both agree that the series of documents negotiated over the past several years contains the outlines of a deal.

The co-chairs hosted the presidents in Vienna last November. This was their first meeting since January 2012 – and the first time since 2009 for them to meet one-on-one. We were encouraged by their conversation, and by their stated commitment to find a way forward. Since that time, we have met on ten separate occasions with one or both foreign ministers to keep the discussion alive.

It is clear, however, that only the presidents have the ability to conclude a deal with such transformative consequences for their countries. It is the presidents who must take the bold steps needed to make peace. The United States has pressed both leaders to meet again soon and take advantage of this window of opportunity when peace is possible.

***

When I made that first trip to Baku and Yerevan last fall, I carried with me President Obama’s endorsement and reaffirmation of the U.S. commitment to working for peace as a Minsk Group co-chair and a close partner with both countries. The outlines of a compromise were already well established by that point, and my message was that the time had come for a renewed effort to bring peace to the region.

Let me walk you through the key elements of that “well-established” compromise, all of which have been in the public domain since appearing in joint statements by Presidents Obama, Medvedev, and Sarkozy in L’Aquila in 2009 and Muskoka in 2010. These principles and elements form the basis of U.S. policy toward the Minsk Group and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

At the heart of a deal are the UN Charter and relevant documents and the core principles of the Helsinki Final Act. In particular, we focus on those principles and commitments that pertain to the non-use or threat of force, territorial integrity, and equal rights and self-determination of peoples.

Building on that foundation, there are six elements that will have to be part of any peace agreement if it is to endure. While the sequencing and details of these elements remains the subject of negotiations, they must be seen as an integrated whole. Any attempt to select some elements over others will make it impossible to achieve a balanced solution.

In no particular order, these elements are:

First, in light of Nagorno-Karabakh’s complex history, the sides should commit to determining its final legal status through a mutually agreed and legally binding expression of will in the future. This is not optional. Interim status will be temporary.

Second, the area within the boundaries of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region that is not controlled by Baku should be granted an interim status that, at a minimum, provides guarantees for security and self-governance.

Third, the occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh should be returned to Azerbaijani control. There can be no settlement without respect for Azerbaijan’s sovereignty, and the recognition that its sovereignty over these territories must be restored.

Fourth, there should be a corridor linking Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh. It must be wide enough to provide secure passage, but it cannot encompass the whole of Lachin district.

Fifth, an enduring settlement will have to recognize the right of all IDPs and refugees to return to their former places of residence.

Sixth and finally, a settlement must include international security guarantees that would include a peacekeeping operation. There is no scenario in which peace can be assured without a well-designed peacekeeping operation that enjoys the confidence of all sides.

The time has come for the sides to commit themselves to peace negotiations, building on the foundation of work done so far. It is not realistic to conclude that occasional meetings are sufficient by themselves to bring about a lasting peace.

When such negotiations commence, the parties should not only reconfirm their commitment to the ceasefire but also undertake much-needed and long-sought security confidence-building measures.

Once we get into such peace negotiations, there is a much broader range of practical issues that we can put on the table to benefit all sides. There are economic and commercial incentives to develop; energy, transportation, and communications links to rebuild; and travel and people-to-people programs that can begin to counter the dangerously one-sided narratives that currently prevail.

The co-chairs of the Minsk Group share a common interest in helping the sides reach a peaceful resolution. We intend to continue working through the Minsk Group as the primary channel for resolving this conflict. Together with France, the United States and Russia share a common commitment to peace and security in Nagorno-Karabakh. The United States stands ready to help in any way we can. I would also call on the diaspora communities in the United States and around the world to speak out for peace and to help bring an end to this conflict.

Of course, it is up to the governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan to take the first step. They should consider measures, even unilateral ones, that will demonstrate their stated commitment to making progress, reducing tensions, and improving the atmosphere for negotiations. They should reduce the hostile rhetoric, and prepare their populations for peace, not war.

Track II efforts to build people-to-people contacts between Azerbaijanis and Armenians are no less integral to a lasting settlement. Programs of this kind can help citizens of both countries prepare for peace and find reconciliation with the pain of the past. We expect the sides to support organizations and individuals which are committed to Track II and people-to-people programs.

I hope that you will work with us to make the case for a lasting peace. The co-chairs have the mandate to facilitate negotiations, but we should all be supporting engaged citizens, secular and religious leaders, NGOs, media outlets, and others working toward these goals. A lasting peace must be built not on a piece of paper, but on the trust, confidence, and participation of the people of both countries.

Let’s work together to build the demand for peace. Let’s demand the benefits that a peaceful settlement will bring to people across the region.

Thank you.

The post ANCA: Warlick Statement on Nagorno Karabakh ‘Offers Nothing New’ appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Opening…for Dynamic Leader, Consensus Builder

$
0
0

Able to Inspire and Work with Diverse Groups

Armenia reminds me of an idyllic lake. The feel-good news that comes from Armenia is eagerly accepted because we want our country to succeed, but like the placid surface of the lake, the good news hides the turbulence that lies below. There has to come a time when we realize that Armenia’s future cannot substantially improve until the symbiotic relationship between one-party rule and the oligarchs it sustains is broken. Although Moscow may control our external relations for the present, it should not be an excuse for allowing the existing internal situation that saps our strength and condemns us to mediocrity to continue.

If there is to be a viable opposition coalition, the need remains to find a dynamic leader, passionate for reform, a consensus builder able to inspire and work with diverse groups. As yet, no party or coalition of parties has presented a viable candidate. The resignation of Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan, whether voluntary or forced, requires President Serge Sarkisian to name a replacement who will have three weeks to form a new cabinet. The opposition coalition formed by the Prosperous Party, the Armenian National Congress, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, and the Heritage Party has taken credit for the resignation. All well and good. It is about time that these opposition parties decided to work together. However, it remains to be seen how effectively they can mesh their respective strengths and adhere to a common agenda. Any opportunistic effort by coalition members to chart their own course against a seasoned politician like President Sarkisian will render the coalition ineffective and allow him to play one party against another.

Armenia needs a dedicated opposition to mobilize the electorate to support reform. The naming of Hovik Abrahamian, the present parliamentary speaker, as the new prime minister and a reshuffling of cabinet positions does nothing to end one-party rule, or the dominant role of the oligarchs, or the corruption and favoritism that is an integral part of governance, nor to address the gross inequities in the distribution of national wealth, etc. Whatever changes in cabinet appointments will be, at best, cosmetic in nature. As Parliamentary Speaker Abrahamian is Sarkisian’s alter ego in parliament. With 69 votes plus 6 members from the Rule of Law Party that vote with the majority, Sarkisian controls 75 seats out of the 131 seats in parliament. He has the votes to continue setting his own course.

Seeking reform is a daunting task that must first overcome the reluctance of the people to confront authority. Added to this is the fact that within Armenia there is a segment of the population that does not have to be concerned about being employed, or earning an adequate income, not about the education and job prospects of their children or the availability of adequate housing or medical care. Since these individuals and families have little or no reason to view existing conditions with trepidation, they cannot be expected to be ardent supporters for reform. However, on the other side of what is a sharp divide are the socioeconomically disenfranchised segment of the population and the social activists who seek to redress the numerous shortcomings of the administration.

This disenfranchised segment of the population carries the burden of poverty within Armenia that continues to hover above 30 percent; unemployment and underemployment annually exceeds 20 percent. Many young people and families within this segment are literally forced to emigrate to seek a better life, as are fathers and husbands who must seek employment in other countries to support their families. Many live in substandard housing—some since the Spitak earthquake that occurred more than two decades ago—and most have limited access to the medical delivery system. More specifically, this includes miners earning substandard wages in poorly regulated extractive operations that degrade the environment, exposing both the workers and nearby populations to a range of debilitating health problems. It also includes those vulnerable young women who must leave the orphanage at age 18 without sufficient transitional facilities that would provide them with the necessary social and economic skills before entering society. There are more examples, if more are thought to be required.

There can be no question that present conditions are the outcome of the 70 stultifying years Armenia survived under an ersatz economic system conceived to meet the political objectives of the Bolshevik new order. The legacy of those presumably prosperous years is the root cause of the malaise that grips Armenia today. Others are quick to say in defense of existing conditions that the problems vexing Armenia are no different than those that perplex so many other countries. Neither explanation should serve to justify existing conditions.

The fact that corruption and favoritism permeates every aspect of life in Armenia, whether economic, political, or juridical, should not be rationalized as a necessary transformational stage in our country’s development. At what point does institutionalized corruption and favoritism destroy the moral and ethical fabric of a nation, replacing hope with indifference? At that point mediocrity becomes an acceptable objective. The longer these insidious conditions remain integral to governance, the difficulty to effect needed reform through peaceful means increases exponentially.

As frustration builds, especially among the younger element of the population whose options are either diminished or perhaps foreclosed, demonstrations over mundane issues can easily escalate in intensity and purpose, as well as expand geographically. And just as important, there can never be any guarantee as to how the authorities will respond. Armenians are fiercely independent, conservative, and passive with respect to confronting authority. This is both a hindrance to effecting any movement for reform, as well as an asset in preventing spontaneous anti-government outbursts that could become radicalized with tragic consequences.

For any political party or opposition coalition to believe that it presently has the influence to effect reform without having effectively mobilized citizen support is shortsighted. Organizing support at the grassroots level is a tedious, but necessary task. The influence of any opposition movement will be directly proportional to its ability to fill the streets of Yerevan if necessary with at least 70,000 to 80,000 citizens supporting reform. Admittedly, this is an extremely difficult requirement for a party or a coalition to meet, but it is no more than what reality demands. Unfortunately, reform is not going to come because political parties want it. It will not come because it is necessary. It will come when the citizens are willing to support it. For the leadership of any party or opposition coalition to believe that it now has the ability to affect any change is seriously misreading what is required.

The fact that one million voters did not cast ballots during the 2013 presidential election speaks as much to their resignation that fraudulent practices by the governing party would ensure the reelection of President Sarkisian, as it does to their cynicism that the political parties and their leaders either lack the ability or the commitment—or both—to represent their legitimate concerns. As we have seen in parliamentary and presidential elections, once that perception has been established in the minds of the voter, those political parties become strictly marginal players in the political process. Four of the 6 parties represented in parliament have a combined total of only 23 seats, attesting to this fact.

One need not be prescient to know that the present administration will have its anointed standard bearer elected in the 2018 presidential election. Given this expected result, Armenia will continue to be governed as an oligarchy until 2023 (almost a decade from now) with the added prospect of former President Sarkisian possibly occupying a more powerful position as prime minister, assuming that contemplated changes take place. And what will the domestic prospects for Armenia be during these years? And for the years that follow? If the political parties cannot develop a close, harmonious working relationship and begin building support within the electorate, especially with the disenfranchised and the incoming generations, little is likely to change.

The malaise that afflicts Armenia cannot be cured until the power of the monopolists is curtailed; a more equitable distribution of national wealth (income, housing, medical services, education, employment opportunities, etc.) is crafted; and the personal guarantees declared in the constitution are objectively enforced. The reform required is not necessarily in the type of government, but in one-party governance that ignores the constitution at will, sustains the oligarchs, and allows corruption and favoritism to serve political ends. It remains to be seen how the appointment of Hovik Abrahamian to replace Tigran Sargsyan as prime minister and the formation of a new cabinet will change any of this.

Movement toward a more democratic form of governance and the strengthening of the country’s economic foundation must take place. For the time being, shifting our orientation from East to West is not an option. At present our military is supported by Russia, which is “home” to the largest concentration of Armenians outside the Homeland. Not only is it a major source of investments in Armenia, it also controls the country’s basic infrastructure and is the major supplier of heating fuel. This should be a period during which the groundwork for reform can begin. Whatever changes that may take place in Armenia, our dependence on Russia will remain. The absolute need is to prepare for whatever may occur in the future that is important. For the present, this relationship may well be the most beneficial for Armenia.

Without the backing of thousands of citizens willing to take to the streets if necessary, no single party or coalition can be effective in curtailing one-party rule. When that is achieved, the stranglehold that the oligarchs have on the economic system can be brought under control, thus eliminating the artificial restraints that were openly and covertly used to protect their economic interests. Free of these restraints, investment opportunities will be largely determined by the marketplace. Armenia is not devoid of the necessary human and natural resources to support a robust economy, certainly an economy that could significantly expand production and improve productivity to provide employment opportunities to a wider spectrum of workers based on age, skill, and education in both the farm and non-farm sectors of the economy. An expanding economy would encourage family formation, increase the birth rate, and put an end to the demographic hemorrhaging that is weakening our country year by year.

The struggle we have been engaged in since the devastation wrought upon us by the Armenian Genocide is still with us. That struggle must first be won in Armenia. The fortunes of Artsakh, Javakhk, and yes, even Hai Tahd, are intimately tied to an economically stronger democratic Armenia whose citizens are empowered to participate in the development of their country. Before this can happen the opposition, whether a single party or a coalition, if there is one in more than name only, needsa dynamic leader, passionate for reform, who is a consensus builder able to inspire and work with diverse groups. Can it be that over two decades of independence has yet to develop a cadre of potential candidates?

The post Opening…for Dynamic Leader, Consensus Builder appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

An Interview with Designer of Genocide Monument in Vancouver

$
0
0

“The fingerprint is an evidence of absence and the design monumentalizes the reality of that absence.”

—Matilda Aslizadeh

 

Matilda Aslizadeh is a visual artist who works in a hybrid style between video, photography, and animation and has an interest in (re)thinking narrative structures. Her work has been exhibited internationally in galleries and film festivals, most recently at Art Souterrain (Montreal, 2013) and the Foreman Art Gallery (Sherbrooke, 2012). She teaches courses in photography, critical theory, and digital media at Emily Carr University of Art and Design and Kwantlen Polytechnic University in Vancouver, BC. She is a member of the Board of Directors at VIVO Media Arts Centre in Vancouver. Her latest work is the design of the Armenian Genocide monument in Vancouver.

The official unveiling ceremony of the Vancouver Genocide monument on April 27, 2014

The official unveiling ceremony of the Vancouver Genocide monument on April 27, 2014

K.S.—Matilda, first let’s talk about you as an artist. You’ve been showing your work nationally and internationally since 2000. For those who aren’t familiar with your art, could you tell us what art forms you create and exhibit?

M.A.—I primarily make videos that take an experimental approach to storytelling and have a layered appearance incorporating visual effects and animation. My most recent major video project, “Hero of Our Time” (2009), tells the story of a child soldier in a fictional and unmentioned country. In it, the fictional sequences are combined with video games, a miniature model city, an operatic aria, documentary images from the internet, and footage of the location where the fictional sequences were shot, which happens to be the site of a residential school in Mission BC. This varied and layered approach attempts to turn the well-meaning documentary about unspeakable violence happening somewhere else in the “third-world” on its head.

The Vancouver Armenian Genocide Monument is my first major three-dimensional work.

K.S.—How do you understand art and how do you think it influences people?

M.A.—I think that contemporary visual art has very little influence over people’s lives due to a combination of causes that range from the fact that it has become an esoteric, academic practise, to the fact that it is often categorized as a kind of entertainment and then out-performed by much more spectacular forms of the latter. Also, there is a hesitance on the part of most people to actively interpret contemporary art. I teach an art history course in the adult Continuing Education program at Emily Carr University, and my students frequently express surprise when I ask them, “Well, what do you think? What ideas does it evoke for you?” They almost always don’t think they have the capability or mandate to make these interpretations; however, this is exactly what contemporary art demands.

Speaking for myself, I think art should both move people on an emotional level and provoke thought, but I think many factors—some completely outside the control of the artist—have to come together for this to happen. In this instance, I was very lucky to work on a project that already has a profound importance for an entire community.

The fingerprint of a survivor of the Armenian Genocide that was used to design the monument

The fingerprint of a survivor of the Armenian Genocide that was used to design the monument

K.S.—On April 27, an Armenian Genocide monument was unveiled in Vancouver. As the designer of the monument, how did you come up with the design?

M.A.—The design is based on an archival fingerprint of an individual who experienced the genocide. The fingerprint pattern is magnified so that it begins to evoke a landscape, and the negative space of the pattern is cut through to create a lace-like appearance. The sculpture is raised from the ground and supported by 50 rods that line up with an invisible map of the geographical locations of the massacres.

I arrived at the central motif of the fingerprint quite early on in the process, and it stubbornly fixed itself in my mind. When this happens, I usually see the idea through to the end.

K.S.—The monument actually is an antithesis of the “monument,” in the sense that it’s a fingerprint, raised slightly from the ground. Can you tell us what thoughts went into the conception of the structure and what, exactly, it represents?

M.A.—The fingerprint represents a broad range of ideas for me and, I believe, allows space for viewers to arrive at their own ideas and interpretations. On the most fundamental level, the fingerprint is a trace, an imprint of a body that once existed and no longer exists. It is evidence of absence, the absence of so many lives stories and futures. It monumentalizes the reality of this absence. In this sense it is antithetical to the majority of monuments produced in the 20th century, which either glorify a particular individual or use a (usually) female body to stand in for an abstract concept. This monument is about the fact that the figure is no longer here, but not forgotten. Rather, the trace the figure left behind is magnified and celebrated.

K.S.—And a fingerprint can denote other things, too…

M.A.—Yes, absolutely. Fingerprints have historically been used by governments to track and control people in their borders. This type of tracking and control can provide security, but is also usually the first step in state-perpetrated atrocities. Contemporary states are coding more and more biological information into nationally issued identifications, so for me there is a reminder here of how states control bodies in the present.

Fingerprints are also unique to the individual and can stand in for the genetic code or DNA of the individual and their gender, race, and ethnicity. In this sense, monumentalizing the fingerprint can denote the survival or perseverance of life and, by extension, culture.

K.S.—We are approaching the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide. What do you think is the role of monuments in commemorating victims of tragedies, and in this case the 1.5 million Armenian victims of the first genocide of the 20th century?

M.A.—On one level, I think history and memory are extremely fragile things that constantly need to be retold and refashioned in order to remain a living part of people’s experience, so monuments function as another instance of retelling.

Artist Matilda Aslizadeh

Artist Matilda Aslizadeh

On another level, I think it is very powerful to see something that has so much internal, psychological resonance externalized into a physical object. In this sense, monuments validate the feelings held by people who have experienced trauma by giving them a shape that everyone can see.

K.S.—What will be your next project? Do you think you will come back to the Armenian theme at some point again in your creative life? What do you think it might be?

M.A.—I am currently working on two video projects: a short animation project that will be shown in Montreal in September and a longer video project that will be shown in Toronto in next April. The concept behind both will revolve around borders boundaries and the desire to separate good from evil. I hope to return to an Armenian theme one day. I’m particularly interested in the multiple family histories we all have as a diaspora culture and how these histories intersect with the larger political events in the lives of the nations we live in.

 

The post An Interview with Designer of Genocide Monument in Vancouver appeared first on Armenian Weekly.

Viewing all 2285 articles
Browse latest View live